| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 104282 | 2009-10-22 20:38:00 | i5, i7, 1156, 1366, dual channel, triple channel, I can't decide! | wratterus (105) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 823259 | 2009-11-14 01:47:00 | Also, it's not that CPU's got specifically much faster, just they got smaller and added more cores ;) | Chilling_Silence (9) | ||
| 823260 | 2009-11-14 03:12:00 | My CPU score was 1200.:confused::confused::confused: I'm having a hard time believing CPU's got many many times more powerful in such a short space of time. Syntetic Benchmarks are wortheless, however the X2 processors are a long way behind Core2 and even further I7 clock for clock. Most Syntechtic benchmarks take into account all cores, so a dual core will be like half the score of a quad, and in real performance terms thats basically garbage of course accept in crunching. I do believe we are starting to see the point where dual cores below 3Ghz are starting to bottleneck some high end GPU's slighlty in a few games at high resolutions, but they still have life left in them yet. |
Battleneter2 (9361) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | |||||