Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 145787 2018-01-28 05:44:00 Hot as prefect (6291) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1445608 2018-02-14 06:29:00 Negligible, subtle, such precise terms :D KarameaDave (15222)
1445609 2018-02-14 07:47:00 Well by subtle I meant gradual and not perceptible, ie it does not suddenly lift vertically in a way that we can notice. The earths Diameter is approx 12742 km, divide that by 384mm (assuming that's correct I didn't check) and we see that the land surface of earth is distorted by a factor of approx 1 in 33.18 million when the moon passes overhead. That fits my personal definition of subtle and negligible quite well. I tried to convert that to a % but my calculator doesn't go that small. dugimodo (138)
1445610 2018-02-14 07:55:00 Well by subtle I meant gradual and not perceptible, ie it does not suddenly lift vertically in a way that we can notice. The earths Diameter is approx 12742 km, divide that by 384mm (assuming that's correct I didn't check) and we see that the land surface of earth is distorted by a factor of approx 1 in 33.18 million when the moon passes overhead. That fits my personal definition of subtle and negligible quite well. I tried to convert that to a % but my calculator doesn't go that small.

Is the ant on the tow rope calculable?
prefect (6291)
1445611 2018-02-14 08:10:00 Well by subtle I meant gradual and not perceptible, ie it does not suddenly lift vertically in a way that we can notice. The earths Diameter is approx 12742 km, divide that by 384mm (assuming that's correct I didn't check) and we see that the land surface of earth is distorted by a factor of approx 1 in 33.18 million when the moon passes overhead. That fits my personal definition of subtle and negligible quite well. I tried to convert that to a % but my calculator doesn't go that small.

Yes. but expressed as a percentage of a typical oceanic tidal variation it is around 10%, not negligible in those terms.
KarameaDave (15222)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11