| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 93516 | 2008-09-20 22:43:00 | Vote National. | Metla (12) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 706591 | 2008-09-22 21:31:00 | I'm not inclined to vote for a party whose leader can't remember how many shares he's owned. Martynz But you're happy (I assume) to vote for a Party led by a woman who has never, in all her 'working' life, had a real job? And Cullen isn't much better (apologies to any teachers out there)... |
johcar (6283) | ||
| 706592 | 2008-09-22 22:22:00 | What "real job" has John Key ever had? Playing the money markets........what a useful occupation!!!!! Martynz |
martynz (5445) | ||
| 706593 | 2008-09-22 22:29:00 | That *is* a real job - the taxpayer wasn't providing his pay-packet. | johcar (6283) | ||
| 706594 | 2008-09-22 22:41:00 | I'm not inclined to vote for a party whose leader can't remember how many shares he's owned. Martynz AFAIK, the shares were already purchased and in order to be deemed insider trading and conflict of interest, he has to benefit from the transaction, which in the wash up he did not. |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 706595 | 2008-09-22 23:05:00 | Who cares about the shares and insider trading, overall he lost money on the shares. A lot of people here would like a prime minister who was on the dole or dpb I suppose. I would rather have a business person the government is really a big business isnt it? I will not stay in this country if labor gets in power again. I will go to Western Australia and stay there until National is voted back in |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 706596 | 2008-09-22 23:44:00 | a Party led by a woman who has never, in all her 'working' life, had a real job? An easy statement to make off the cuff - but it doesn't really stand up to reason . She was elected to her position through a process far more transparent than that of any "real" job . Not only that, the hours that MPs work are far above those of any "real" job - especially when the MP holds a portfolio . And Cullen isn't much better (apologies to any teachers out there) . . . I assume the apology is to your own teachers - for being their student . . . ? |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 706597 | 2008-09-23 00:17:00 | Sorry Johcar for having to cast your gaze upon such drivel. Nothing can be done. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 706598 | 2008-09-23 00:37:00 | But you're happy (I assume) to vote for a Party led by a woman who has never, in all her 'working' life, had a real job? And Cullen isn't much better (apologies to any teachers out there)... So what is a real job? She gets paid a salary for working incredibly long hours. Also, compared to anyone who may have chosen a private sector career, she doesn't get paid all that much for how hard she works. I heard she can often work up to 18 hours a day... And as for getting paid by the taxpayer... so does everyone who works in the public service. Do they not have real jobs? Policemen are just playing cops and robbers? Doctors are in the same boat, along with too many others to name. She's a career politician, and however unfeminine, or however useless most her colleagues are, she's incredibly good at it. The only thing I can see that might be "wrong" with her, in my view, is that she was born a woman. If she were a man, most likely you'd all have the utmost respect for her. Powerful women are intimidating, and most people can't get over that. |
Thebananamonkey (7741) | ||
| 706599 | 2008-09-23 00:47:00 | Sorry Johcar for having to cast your gaze upon such drivel. Nothing can be done. :groan: :groan: might have to join prefect in WA..... |
johcar (6283) | ||
| 706600 | 2008-09-23 00:55:00 | She's a career politician, And there is your answer. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | |||||