| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 93845 | 2008-10-03 01:53:00 | Self defense | SolMiester (139) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 709515 | 2008-10-04 06:32:00 | Mean while the guy would have most likly have lost his house and business paying for a lawyer to defend him while the guys that tried to rob him get a tax payer public defender and most likey get off.. got it in a nutshell :( you get screwed even if it doesn't get to court. even if you get financial assistance you are expected to pay it back ! just the threat of being charged and incurring legal fees is a threat the police like to employ. |
tweak'e (69) | ||
| 709516 | 2008-10-04 07:25:00 | Mean while the guy would have most likly have lost his house and business paying for a lawyer to defend him while the guys that tried to rob him get a tax payer public defender and most likey get off.. The Sensible Sentencing Trust are going to pay his legal fees, like they did the sports shop owner. :) |
Trev (427) | ||
| 709517 | 2008-10-04 19:34:00 | Originally Posted by Trev Anyway it has to go before a jury,and if I was on the jury, I would find him not guilty no matter what evidence the crown put across. Very wise Trevo,I am right behind you. Lets hope we get called. Let's hope you don't. Advancing your own political agenda on a jury is just plain wrong. You would, after all, be taking an oath as a juror: "...solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that you will try the case before you to the best of your ability and give your verdict according to the evidence?" |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||