| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 94612 | 2008-11-05 07:37:00 | Very sick Judge! | royaloaks (8205) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 717751 | 2008-11-06 00:03:00 | Shotgun is a bit messy isn't it? Rifle ammo is cheaper anyway. And more humane. |
Thebananamonkey (7741) | ||
| 717752 | 2008-11-06 00:08:00 | nah, shotgun == greater fun factor for me. "Open your mouth please..." BLAM!! ohhh look at all the purdy brains :wub |
Bozo (8540) | ||
| 717753 | 2008-11-06 00:57:00 | Shotgun is a bit messy isn't it? Rifle ammo is cheaper anyway. And more humane. Generally speaking a rifle will have less 'kick' than a shotty, so would be the favoured execution weapon by ACC. Less rehabilitation claims for executioners complaining about sore shoulders.... nah, shotgun == greater fun factor for me. "Open your mouth please..." BLAM!! ohhh look at all the purdy brains :wub Brains???? Unlikely, despite the shot being to the back of the head! |
johcar (6283) | ||
| 717754 | 2008-11-06 01:31:00 | What we need is a justice system so severe that people are too afraid to commit crimes against there fellow man. The Romans had a pretty severe system. They liked to crucify people. Took a few days to die - or even longer if you were tied to the cross instead of nailed there. They still had crime in Roman society though. So in other words your idea is as shallow as your knowledge of history. |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 717755 | 2008-11-06 01:45:00 | The Romans had a pretty severe system . They liked to crucify people . Took a few days to die - or even longer if you were tied to the cross instead of nailed there . They still had crime in Roman society though . So in other words your idea is as shallow as your knowledge of history . So the way it is now is working?? Your getting your hands into law, you should know history means nothing, Im sure it must be part of the training, sort of like 'well this guy has 17 previous convictions, he must get one more chance' . I dont know whether judges have certain restrictions as to what they can punish people by, but Im sure they could at least try and act as if the had a spine . Noone is really afraid of going to prison, do a bit of time, save some money, free rent, food etc Now lets say a repeat rapist was killed, there is zero chances he will ever offend, yet they still get let out and they do offend again and again, and you cant sit there and say that doesnt happen . |
rob_on_guitar (4196) | ||
| 717756 | 2008-11-06 01:52:00 | So in other words your idea is as shallow as your knowledge of history. Oh please, keep away from the personal attack via making a highly incorrect assumption. :mad: I haven't studied the statistics of crime back in Roman times, but I would place a fairly large wager on the fact that the crime rates would have been lower than what they are today here in NZ. Ask most criminals today why they did what they could and you are met with a shrug of the shoulders and a 'I don't care' attitude. Because why should they care? At worst they spend a few months in prison with everything paid for, or get let off with some petty amount of coummunity service. Take for example graffiti 'artists'. If the punishment for being caught for graffiti was to have the offending hand 'removed' with an axe or similar device, how many youngsters do you think would be as keen to partake in this activity? Sure the harsher the punishment the more devious the criminals become, but at the same time you eleminate all the 'pussies' who aren't real criminals at heart but do it just for the kick and because the consequence for being caught isn't significant enough. You will never be able to rule out criminal activity all together, it is part of human nature to rebel, and some express it in different ways than others. But at the end of the day, harsher nastier punishments would see a drop in criminal activity. |
Bozo (8540) | ||
| 717757 | 2008-11-06 01:54:00 | Noone is really afraid of going to prison, do a bit of time, save some money, free rent, food etc. Um.... I'm afraid of going to prison. I'm sure I'm not alone on this. |
Thebananamonkey (7741) | ||
| 717758 | 2008-11-06 01:59:00 | The Romans had a pretty severe system. They liked to crucify people. Took a few days to die - or even longer if you were tied to the cross instead of nailed there. They still had crime in Roman society though. So in other words your idea is as shallow as your knowledge of history. LMAO...correct me if I am wrong, but wasnt it you who refered to Roman's?....How is that then Demon hunters lack of historic knowledge...and to be fair not once did the Romans have repeat offenders..... |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 717759 | 2008-11-06 02:56:00 | Um.... I'm afraid of going to prison. I'm sure I'm not alone on this. Most crims arent afraid. Hence repeat offenders. |
rob_on_guitar (4196) | ||
| 717760 | 2008-11-06 03:06:00 | That's not what you said though, is it? | Thebananamonkey (7741) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 | |||||