| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 94684 | 2008-11-07 21:56:00 | Who voted? | wratterus (105) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 718535 | 2008-11-07 21:56:00 | Pretty self explanatory. 96% of eligible voters are enrolled this year. |
wratterus (105) | ||
| 718536 | 2008-11-07 22:04:00 | I'm not eligible, which is why I'm not really taking it seriously this time. :D I'm eligible for the next one though. |
pcuser42 (130) | ||
| 718537 | 2008-11-07 22:26:00 | Voted this morning - very quick and simple process. It was encouraging that there was a constant stream of people going into, and coming out of, the polling centre. | somebody (208) | ||
| 718538 | 2008-11-07 22:39:00 | I'm surprised anyone would think of asking such a question here. Surely a bunch of intelligent PF1 people would ALL be voting today, unless too young..? Goes without saying... |
Laura (43) | ||
| 718539 | 2008-11-07 22:43:00 | I've cast my vote this morning. I had to make a special declaration vote due to my circumstances. Cheers :) |
Renmoo (66) | ||
| 718540 | 2008-11-07 22:46:00 | Well just went and did the nasty deed - Now I can complain :) But I did have to smile/ quiet chuckle following This Posting (pressf1.pcworld.co.nz) - The Picture - Bill and Ben Party :waughh: The Mrs and I were laughing on the way back - Just think if they actually WON - :eek: Who would be "the Leader" - Bill Takes Mon/Wed/Friday ------ Saw the cannabis party yesterday on the Petone foreshore - - can we tick one of the boxes yet on the Bingo/Pic - They already looked stoned :waughh: | wainuitech (129) | ||
| 718541 | 2008-11-07 22:52:00 | I'm surprised anyone would think of asking such a question here. Surely a bunch of intelligent PF1 people would ALL be voting today, unless too young..? Goes without saying... Why? For me to vote for someone means I support both them and their policies. None of those standing today meet that criteria, so I shan’t be bothering the scorers. I simply don’t believe in having to pick the best of a bad lot. Remember, Guy Fawkes was the only person to enter Parliament with honest intentions. ;) |
B.M. (505) | ||
| 718542 | 2008-11-07 22:53:00 | Maybe later - it is such a nice day that I came to work. :banana :eek: | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 718543 | 2008-11-07 22:54:00 | Well just went and did the nasty deed - Now I can complain :) But I did have to smile/ quiet chuckle following This Posting (pressf1.pcworld.co.nz) - The Picture - Bill and Ben Party :waughh: The Mrs and I were laughing on the way back - Just think if they actually WON - :eek: Who would be "the Leader" - Bill Takes Mon/Wed/Friday ------ Saw the cannabis party yesterday on the Petone foreshore - - can we tick one of the boxes yet on the Bingo/Pic - They already looked stoned :waughh: A bunch of us were actually going to play the B&B drinking game, but speedway teams racing and fireworks are on tonight. :D |
wratterus (105) | ||
| 718544 | 2008-11-07 22:56:00 | Why? For me to vote for someone means I support both them and their policies . None of those standing today meet that criteria, so I shan’t be bothering the scorers . I simply don’t believe in having to pick the best of a bad lot . Remember, Guy Fawkes was the only person to enter Parliament with honest intentions . ;) I think that can go both ways . Rather than not voting because theres no one you really like (isn't that the same with almost everyone?) why don't you vote for the lesser of a bunch of evils? |
wratterus (105) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |||||