Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 95903	2008-12-21 00:07:00	Dixon to seek 3rd trial	Zippity (58)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
731309	2008-12-21 03:26:00	In the possibility that he is indeed 15, there is no reason as to why he shouldn't be angered at the topic at hand. I've been paying tax for nearly 3 years now. May not be as much as most people, but my parents certainly pays a hell of a lot each year, and there's no doubt the money is being used on these scumbags to try to prove their non-existent innocence. There should be a new proposition to the law: if a criminal is successfully convicted, then his/her lawyer should go down with the criminal. I have made the mistake of confusing Zippity with another member here. For this mistake I have apologised. In the event my parents opened a bank account for me at birth I may have paid taxes all my life. This does not mean I know who the guilty party is though. In the case of Dixon I have no real doubt as to the verdict. What about Arthur Allen Thomas whom had two trials and a pardon. Then we have David Bain for example and also we have Scott Watson. Please also consider all of these people may be guilty. I can not say for sure as I was not present when the events took place. So I take it that you are of the opinion that if I defend any allegation in court knowing that I am not guilty and employ a lawyer then the lawyer also gets done as well.	Sweep (90)
731310	2008-12-21 03:31:00	In New Zealand we have a system of law and every person has the right of appeal as matters stand at the moment . Appeals and things are fine but 3 trials???!! That's a bit excessive, surely even you feel that .	beeswax34 (63)
1 2