| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 105980 | 2009-12-21 02:05:00 | L.E.S - Law Enforcement System-Sperry mainframe Computer | Sims (15521) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 841905 | 2010-03-03 06:00:00 | Well go to the cops and ask them. I would go and check but they run a script that gets the info from the WC. And most of it is windows based now. And all they have to do now is type in someone's name, and it comes up with whatever | Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 841906 | 2010-03-03 20:53:00 | nice debate we are having here. Here's my 2 cents worth! I believe that all the preformat switch messages e.g *DRUGS, *MODA, *FIRE, all operated in FORCED PRINT MODE whereby, if the boxes were all filled in correctly-the required fields, the Wanganui System would accept the switch message from the sender terminal, & force print a record of the switch message sent at the sender terminal, to the Wanganui Mainframe, via the dot matrix printer. |
Sims (15521) | ||
| 841907 | 2010-03-03 20:58:00 | I dont know about this OHPWA versus OHPWAB thing. I'd assume that given that the switch message is sent by OHPWA that that's all that would be displayed on any forced print printout of that switch message transaction?? Does a forced print i.e, one that is generated automatically, tag the printout with the screen it was sent from?? |
Sims (15521) | ||
| 841908 | 2010-03-03 21:11:00 | I think the solution to this question is in the nature of the switch message being a FORCED PRINT. ALL the *FIRE, *MODA, * DRUGS are forced print-they print out automatically off the sending terminal printer, from the terminal sending the switch message. At the receiving end of the switch message, the receivers terminal automatically prints off that *MODA for e.g, as well. I do not believe anyone will be able to find a legitimate switch message in an *moda or *FIRE or *DRUGS that shows a 6 character identity, i.e OHPWA versus OHPWAB other than those which are fakes? |
Sims (15521) | ||
| 841909 | 2010-03-03 21:12:00 | As I have previously mentioned all the terminals I have seen or communicated with or got messages from had a five character ID. | Sweep (90) | ||
| 841910 | 2010-03-03 22:01:00 | Well fire and drugs arent valid ID's anyway. And printing was automatic. It printed whatever message out, if you werent logged in, and on the terminal. But if you were at the terminal (and logged in), you would print the message out. And when you send a message, you would print the message out (it doesnt print automatically). And yer it shows the sending terminal on the top of the message / prints whatever terminal when the other end receives it (obviously, they need to know WHERE the message came from) |
Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 841911 | 2010-03-03 22:10:00 | Fire, Drugs are not valid IDs but are valid in terms of an ENQ. | Sweep (90) | ||
| 841912 | 2010-03-03 22:25:00 | *FIRE, *DRUGS & *MODA were merely the preformat templates for their respective reports. required to be sent as per general instructions-G.Is. | Sims (15521) | ||
| 841913 | 2010-03-03 22:28:00 | If you say so. I dont know, never used them | Speedy Gonzales (78) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |||||