| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 96454 | 2009-01-11 05:11:00 | Gaza\Israel Conflict | SolMiester (139) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 737311 | 2009-01-11 23:14:00 | No you wrong again mate....Gaza was controlled by the Palestinians a few years ago, however they had to siege control again when Yasur Arafat couldn't control Hamas and the rest of the terrorists. That fact that Hamas is a terrorist organisation now in government seems to escape you? Hamas dont give a toss about their people, or they wouldnt be hiding their weapon and rockets in Mosques and around the community... |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 737312 | 2009-01-11 23:37:00 | Wrong they only gave Gaza back then put the place under siege when Hamas won elections. The West Bank is still under occupation. Like I said any reasonable male with balls would be firing at the enemy trying to break the siege thats just what you have to do. Soon the Arab Israeli population( they have large families or root a lot) will exceed the Jewish population and the Arabs will vote them out. Thats the end of Israel as we know it unless they want to try apartheid. I can't remember now!,are you a historian or a bus driver?? If the former,I suggest you take up the latter. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 737313 | 2009-01-12 04:21:00 | Did history only start when Jesus was born???? The Israelites were not the first people to settle in that area. We need to go back waaaaay more than 2000 years to see who was there first. The Assyrians took Gaza from the Israelites in about 1100BC but before that the Philistines took it from the Egyptians in about 1200BC. Who controlled the area prior to about 1500/1600BC is a mystery (to me) but various peoples before and after (Greeks, Macedonians, Assyrians, Tyrians, Persians etc.) all have some sort of valid (or not so valid) claim to some part of modern-day Israel/Palestine. Can it be resolved? Of course not - not while there is money to be made from conflict.....and as for state-sponsored terrorism and ignorance of the Geneva Convention (on both sides), that is something we should all fear..... | andrew93 (249) | ||
| 737314 | 2009-01-12 04:26:00 | Well, I'm not interested in before arabs and israelites as they are the current occupiers. | SolMiester (139) | ||
| 737315 | 2009-01-12 04:31:00 | Tell me the basis on which the land was taken from the Palestinians after WW2. Why was that area chosen and not Ayers Rock, Stewart Island or Antarctica? If you aren't interested in the history of the area then don't bother posting and enjoy your ignorance - I hear it is bliss...... EDIT : Actually - why did you start this thread if you didn't want to know about any of the history? And you were the one who stated it was originally owned by the Israelites.....pfffftttt |
andrew93 (249) | ||
| 737316 | 2009-01-12 04:38:00 | Well gee Andrew, if you read the post properly, you would of realised that the statement talked about the current occupiers, not those that no longer live or are not involved with the conflict (stated in the title). Oh, thanks for the insult too mate...pedantic ass aren't you? |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 737317 | 2009-01-12 04:42:00 | Well gee Andrew, if you read the post properly, you would of realised that the statement talked about the current occupiers, not those that no longer live or are not involved with the conflict (stated in the title). Oh, thanks for the insult too mate...pedantic ass aren't you? Not at all. If you raise the history of the area (which you did) and get it wrong then there is no need to be abusive or dismissive about it. If you would like to continue to display your ignorance then be my guest. |
andrew93 (249) | ||
| 737318 | 2009-01-12 04:48:00 | :rolleyes: Cool, we have joined the conflict. Hardly think any of you know the truth when you get get as many views and "facts"as you can experts, real ones and internet warriors. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 737319 | 2009-01-12 04:56:00 | It's only a conflict Metla if both sides are in conflict. I'm not in conflict! :) There has been plenty of research and much evidence to support the 'fact' the Israelites weren't the first occupiers of that piece of land. P.S. "Ignorance" is not a derogatory/insulting term. |
andrew93 (249) | ||
| 737320 | 2009-01-12 05:22:00 | Well, I challenge your information . . . Who originally lived there? Let's see . . . 3,500 yrs ago it was Abraham, a Jew . 2,000-3,000 yrs ago it was the kingdom of Israelites, including both Temples which stood in Jerusalem . Since then, for 2,000 years, there has been uninterrupted Jewish settlement in the land of Israel . Arabs, by contrast, wandered in and out of the land they like to call Palestine, never establishing a significant settlement until Jews came in large numbers and developed it in the 19th century . The term "Palestinian" is a fictional term created by Arafat and the PLO as a propaganda tool in the '60s to dupe people like you into thinking they're the original people there . They're no different than the other tribes of Arabs, they just happened to be inside the borders of what the British decided to call Palestine . They have a massive propaganda war to claim they're the original people, including destroying any archeological evidence of the Israelite period or any Jewish artifacts from the temple mount they can get their hands on . Why bring up anything before that as they are NOT involved in the present conflict . As for calling me ignorant, you are attempting to paint my knowledge as inaccurate and thus insult me . So piss off! |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | |||||