| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 97122 | 2009-02-05 00:41:00 | Dixon is dead, Long live dixon | plod (107) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 745078 | 2009-02-07 00:42:00 | Im so happy that retarded waste of. ... well i cant even be bothered, but Im glad that dickhead is dead. I'm glad he is dead too - but me being glad, and Dixon being a murdering scumbag doesn't discharge the Corrections Dept from their responsibilities. I will be taking an interest in the outcome of any inquiries. I hope his lawyer gets attacked by a psycho to wake him up. So let me get this straight - you are glad that Dixon is dead because he was a violent criminal - but you would like a violent crime to happen to Dixon's lawyer? Are you against violent crime - or in support of it? Your post makes that unclear. |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 745079 | 2009-02-07 00:46:00 | Deaf ears may prevail T. You are dealing with a master of the wrong end of the stick. You are too busy grabbing the end of your own stick to post anything of value to the discussion, Cicero. Why don't you try posting something intelligent for a change? |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 745080 | 2009-02-07 01:24:00 | Why don't you? | roddy_boy (4115) | ||
| 745081 | 2009-02-07 02:11:00 | Who gives a fig? :( :( | Zippity (58) | ||
| 745082 | 2009-02-07 02:57:00 | Why don't you? Succinct and spot on as usual. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 745083 | 2009-02-07 09:04:00 | I'm glad he is dead too - but me being glad, and Dixon being a murdering scumbag doesn't discharge the Corrections Dept from their responsibilities. I will be taking an interest in the outcome of any inquiries. So let me get this straight - you are glad that Dixon is dead because he was a violent criminal - but you would like a violent crime to happen to Dixon's lawyer? Are you against violent crime - or in support of it? Your post makes that unclear. I certainly dont support lawyers who defend violent criminals. |
rob_on_guitar (4196) | ||
| 745084 | 2009-02-07 09:21:00 | Yes....but....the mechanisms you refer to are very much "an after the event" process. On the other hand, Quality Assurance is an ongoing process, a simple specific QC example being continous online dimensional inspection during manufacture, rather than post manufacturing inspection to sort out the defective product from the good. If the medical profession had instituted QA years ago, then it is possible that Herb Greens disastrous treatment of women with cervical cancer at National Womens would have been prevented. There has been a traditional arrogance in the medical field, at one time it wasn't the done thing to ask questions. It has changed radically for the better in more recent years, but still has a way to go. I suspect lawyers would resist an independent outside body telling them how to set up and run a QA system.:rolleyes: A Q&A well known in medical circles: Q. What is the difference between God and a surgeon? A. God knows that he's not a surgeon... |
johcar (6283) | ||
| 745085 | 2009-02-07 09:36:00 | Are you against violent crime - or in support of it? Your post makes that unclear. There's a substantial difference between violence against the innocent and violence against a criminal and his lawyer. A criminal's lawyer is only driven to defend his client by the money his unarguably dirty deed earns. A criminal's lawyer is doing nothing but hurt the society he was educated to protect by leeching the society's money and endangering the safety of the society from the criminal he/she is defending. His post is crystal clear. Perhaps Rob's eyes and mine can see gray, not only black and white. |
qazwsxokmijn (102) | ||
| 745086 | 2009-02-07 09:44:00 | I certainly dont support lawyers who defend violent criminals. But do you think that violent criminals who face trial should be allowed to have lawyers? |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 745087 | 2009-02-07 09:47:00 | There's a substantial difference between violence against the innocent and violence against a criminal and his lawyer. A criminal's lawyer is only driven to defend his client by the money his unarguably dirty deed earns. How are you in any position to judge a lawyers motives? A criminal's lawyer is doing nothing but hurt the society he was educated to protect by leeching the society's money and endangering the safety of the society from the criminal he/she is defending. So people accused of violent crimes deserve no access to a legal defence? |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | |||||