| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 98043 | 2009-03-09 05:58:00 | Evidence gets moved? | Sweep (90) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 754919 | 2009-03-09 11:39:00 | Was it really necessary to post five times in a row? | roddy_boy (4115) | ||
| 754920 | 2009-03-09 12:20:00 | The clock issue in the Bain trial was very important as I remember, the evidence hinged on the accuracy of the computer clock which was taken as infallible but it was probably Win 95 or 98 I think and as far as I remember is not synchronized to an atomic clock on the internet. | zqwerty (97) | ||
| 754921 | 2009-03-09 17:28:00 | Was it really necessary to post five times in a row? You may suspect Sweep posted (or not) five times in a row - but proving it is a different matter. Atomically, it is now 6.19am. |
Deane F (8204) | ||
| 754922 | 2009-03-09 19:52:00 | Was it really necessary to post five times in a row? You cannot, however, prove that because the PC World clock is out by 8 minutes (+-) so therefore there is no accurate evidence proving this. And I don't know what Dean is on about, it's 8:44am. |
--Wolf-- (128) | ||
| 754923 | 2009-03-09 20:16:00 | You cannot, however, prove that because the PC World clock is out by 8 minutes (+-) so therefore there is no accurate evidence proving this. And I don't know what Dean is on about, it's 8:44am. @ Sweep: You can use the highlighted icon to multi-quote BTW, you're all wrong, it's 9.07am |
johcar (6283) | ||
| 754924 | 2009-03-10 04:42:00 | It wasn't Win95 or 98 as the event happened in 1994 so the prosecution case relying on a computer clock for precision and accurate time keeping is ridiculous as one cannot be certain it was set correctly in the first place. | zqwerty (97) | ||
| 754925 | 2009-03-10 05:37:00 | It may have been a DOS box. Or a Win 3.xx. Having looked at the news tonight a Detective Senior Sergeant seems to have difficulty remembering the events on that day too. |
Sweep (90) | ||
| 754926 | 2009-03-10 05:44:00 | The clock issue in the Bain trial was very important as I remember, the evidence hinged on the accuracy of the computer clock which was taken as infallible but it was probably Win 95 or 98 I think and as far as I remember is not synchronized to an atomic clock on the internet. the murders happened in 1994, so the computer would have been DOS + win3.1x the clock would have been set by hand, and maby never checked. back in 1994 it was common to wind back the computer clock and get a few more week out of a trial copy...... the computer clock may have been out by days..... |
robsonde (120) | ||
| 754927 | 2009-03-10 06:05:00 | The Crown has to prove the ca.... My post made no sense as i was half asleep. i cant remember what i was rambling on about.:drool |
rob_on_guitar (4196) | ||
| 754928 | 2009-03-10 06:19:00 | the murders happened in 1994, so the computer would have been DOS + win3.1x the clock would have been set by hand, and maby never checked. back in 1994 it was common to wind back the computer clock and get a few more week out of a trial copy...... the computer clock may have been out by days..... I can remember thinking that at the time - certainly my pc clock was anything but accurate then... |
R.M. (561) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||