| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 98747 | 2009-04-05 21:03:00 | WHICH LCD TELEVISION TO BUY? | brig (1359) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 762566 | 2009-04-07 10:49:00 | whatever you do dont listen to the saleman blabber on about the new motion correcting or whatever its called, complete waste of money. maybe its just new technology or maybe its just me but IMO the tv without the motion correction actually looked smoother, like it was meant to be | hueybot3000 (3646) | ||
| 762567 | 2009-04-07 22:54:00 | whatever you do dont listen to the saleman blabber on about the new motion correcting or whatever its called, complete waste of money. maybe its just new technology or maybe its just me but IMO the tv without the motion correction actually looked smoother, like it was meant to be It is entirely subjective; some people don't notice it, some people notice it and don't like it, I notice it and I prefer it. Motionflow (for sony, it has different names under each brand) inserts 'average' frames in between frames (frame interpolation). The result is more frames per second. |
utopian201 (6245) | ||
| 762568 | 2009-04-08 06:24:00 | yep, and theres different levels of it IMO and it is only mine but i thought that it overcompensated, and more just got in the way. |
hueybot3000 (3646) | ||
| 762569 | 2009-04-08 07:43:00 | Panasonic=Very Reliable, Sony are pretty good too, LG well I sell them but wouldn't touch one. If you want big get plasma, I think that the picture is a bit more realistic looking (closer to real life images) than LCD, I do still like LCD however, but would get 100hz processing - not to be confused with 100Hz processing found in CRTS like your (windows Screen refresh rate) that's completely different. Value for money Plasma have it. |
radium (8645) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||