Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 100296	2009-06-02 23:29:00	Trademe - Typical	pctek (84)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
779278	2009-06-28 23:51:00	"When you look at some of the crime pages the sickness beneficiary seem to feature fairly highly." Do you need a new pair of glasses Cicero. We acknowledge the propensity of these people to behave badly,I am saying and I know it's tricky for you to understand,that others also offend.	Cicero (40)
779279	2009-06-28 23:56:00	Just remember that a "Sickness Beneficiary" may not have a legitimate illness or disability, but may have been classified as a Sickness Beneficiary to remove that person from the Unemployment Benefit statistics. Unemployment figures are often used by an opposition party to beat up the encumbent governing party. By reducing unemployment figures, the government reduces the potential for 'embarrassment'. I understand that this practice was first encouraged by the most recent Labour government, although there seems to be little will in the current government to redress this deliberate misrepresentation... So the crime figures, when reading that a offence has been carried out by a "sickness beneficiary", are skewed. In fact, the offender may just be unemployed, with a classification applied by WINZ and a "friendly" medico to misdirect the statistics...	johcar (6283)
779280	2009-06-29 01:56:00	We acknowledge the propensity of these people to behave badly,I am saying and I know it's tricky for you to understand,that others also offend. I'm beginning to wonder about your IQ (unless you are just having a wooden spoon day) as where did I say no one else but sickness beneficiaries offend.	mikebartnz (21)
779281	2009-06-29 01:59:00	Quite amazing sickness beneficararies cant work but are healthy enough to commit crime. What gives WINZ the right to still pay these scum when they have committed a crime when on a benefit.	prefect (6291)
779282	2009-06-29 08:33:00	You want to rant go start another thread and leave mine alone.	pctek (84)
1 2 3 4 5 6