Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 102467	2009-08-20 03:48:00	Another child dead.	Sweep (90)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
802792	2009-08-29 03:54:00	I cant understand why there is so much outrage when a child is killed or assaulted, according to Family First, they and the larger part of the population want to be able to kick and kill their kids. So, You think I demand the right to kill my children? Your either a moron or.....no wait, Your just a moron.	Metla (12)
802793	2009-08-29 04:10:00	Some things will remain beyond your comprehension,is my guess. Yer probably right. Working with abused kids has consumed over 20 years of my working life. :annoyed:	Lovelee (6586)
802794	2009-08-29 04:12:00	So, You think I demand the right to kill my children? Your either a moron or.....no wait, Your just a moron. Silly little man! You're the moron, making up statements from me. Thats not what I said at all :nerd:	Lovelee (6586)
802795	2009-08-29 04:14:00	Yer probably right. Working with abused kids has consumed over 20 years of my working life. :annoyed: Well, Its about time you changed jobs as it has screwed up your perception.	Metla (12)
802796	2009-08-29 04:35:00	Yer probably right. Working with abused kids has consumed over 20 years of my working life. :annoyed: Surely no sane person would say that the abused kids you deal with were just given a smack by a responsible parent - those sorts of kids are abused (physically, psychologically) and subject to neglect, rather than just disciplined. Kicking and killing kids is quite different from a smack - it's a bit like saying taking a fallen tree branch out of a national park is the same as illegally logging hectares of trees from a protected wildlife reserve. Child abuse is abhorrent, was illegal before s59 was repealed, and would still be illegal if the Burrows amendment was passed.	somebody (208)
802797	2009-08-29 05:44:00	Well, Its about time you changed jobs as it has screwed up your perception. My perception is fine, its the perception of much of the public in NZ thats screwed. They are the ones who do not know the difference tween a smack and abuse, so much so that they want it defined.	Lovelee (6586)
802798	2009-08-29 05:47:00	Child abuse is abhorrent, was illegal before s59 was repealed, and would still be illegal if the Burrows amendment was passed. The repeal had nothing to do with the illegality of child abuse - but everything to do with stopping parents getting away with using weapons and claiming reasonable force. Burrows amendment would make no difference at all to the law or the illegality of child abuse.	Lovelee (6586)
802799	2009-08-29 05:52:00	The repeal had nothing to do with the illegality of child abuse - but everything to do with stopping parents getting away with using weapons and claiming reasonable force. Burrows amendment would make no difference at all to the law or the illegality of child abuse. I guess your so brainwashed that only the death penalty for a smack would make you happy. Time for you to have a career change..	paulw (1826)
802800	2009-08-29 06:06:00	My perception is fine, its the perception of much of the public in NZ thats screwed. They are the ones who do not know the difference tween a smack and abuse, so much so that they want it defined. Yeah, thats it exactly.:annoyed: No wait, That's absurd. Its about telling the government where the line in the sand is in regards to micro-management/interfering in peoples lives.We as a people do not accept criminal charges for disciplining our children. The entire referndum was based on telling the Government they had gone too far down a stupid road not about gaining the rights to abuse our kids to death. I think your a bit lost, and your perception may not be healthy.	Metla (12)
802801	2009-08-29 06:17:00	Please learn the difference between "your" and "you're" - you come across as ignorant if you use the wrong one :)	Zippity (58)
1 2 3 4 5 6