| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 103374 | 2009-09-20 22:13:00 | Latest AV Comparatives test | nofam (9009) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 812216 | 2009-09-20 22:13:00 | Interesting read (link opens as .pdf) (www.av-comparatives.org) | nofam (9009) | ||
| 812217 | 2009-09-20 22:19:00 | Cheers, was looking for this. :thumbs: They still don't see how the AVs behave in a real world environment though, it would be bye bye Nortons and McAfee. AVG has dropped rather dramatically since the last review I saw. I wish they would do more system heaviness tests, just cause I wanna see NOD32 win though. :D |
wratterus (105) | ||
| 812218 | 2009-09-20 22:21:00 | I'd love to know how they test. I see loads of trojan infected PCs using Nortons and McAfees. Last week was a complete disaster - he'd removed Avast and installed McAfees. Complete ****. |
pctek (84) | ||
| 812219 | 2009-09-20 22:26:00 | I see loads of trojan infected PCs using Nortons and McAfees. Last week was a complete disaster - he'd removed Avast and installed McAfees. Complete ****. :lol: :thumbs: |
wratterus (105) | ||
| 812220 | 2009-09-20 22:46:00 | I'd love to know how they test. I see loads of trojan infected PCs using Nortons and McAfees. Last week was a complete disaster - he'd removed Avast and installed McAfees. Complete ****. That guy wins the 'Give yerself an uppercut' award - and it's only Monday! :lol: |
nofam (9009) | ||
| 812221 | 2009-09-21 04:28:00 | Does Nortons and McAfee pay them to get good results or something!?!?!?!?! | password (5384) | ||
| 812222 | 2009-09-21 04:57:00 | You have to wonder | Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 812223 | 2009-09-21 05:41:00 | Oh Well - good for early week laugh :lol: As per usual - lab tests HA! What I want to know is lets say you have 100 infections - how do they manage to get say 97.8% Its either 97 or 98 -- How do they get .8% of an infection, it either finds it or it doesn't :waughh: |
wainuitech (129) | ||
| 812224 | 2009-09-21 06:00:00 | Oh Well - good for early week laugh :lol: As per usual - lab tests HA! What I want to know is lets say you have 100 infections - how do they manage to get say 97.8% Its either 97 or 98 -- How do they get .8% of an infection, it either finds it or it doesn't :waughh: Obviosly it's an average |
plod (107) | ||
| 812225 | 2009-09-21 07:35:00 | Oh Well - good for early week laugh :lol: As per usual - lab tests HA! What I want to know is lets say you have 100 infections - how do they manage to get say 97.8% Its either 97 or 98 -- How do they get .8% of an infection, it either finds it or it doesn't :waughh: The testing in question involved around 1.5M signatures not just 100. Even the smallest category Macro Viruses totalled 1198. Plenty of scope for parts of a %. |
PaulD (232) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||