| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 103495 | 2009-09-25 09:19:00 | Another Debate | Erayd (23) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 813785 | 2009-09-29 05:29:00 | Still waiting to see if anyone else is interested - so far we've had four people (including myself) who have said they are interested in participating, and another two people who have posted in the thread, but not indicated any desire to take part. | Erayd (23) | ||
| 813786 | 2009-09-29 09:38:00 | Nah bol. | roddy_boy (4115) | ||
| 813787 | 2009-10-15 02:37:00 | Bump? | Cato (6936) | ||
| 813788 | 2009-10-15 06:56:00 | Well I was interested but nothing happened. | Sweep (90) | ||
| 813789 | 2009-10-15 08:13:00 | Since there's only 4 people, maybe we could do it as a 2 on 2 debate? Shorter turnaround times, and maybe a topic that doesn't require too much research? | somebody (208) | ||
| 813790 | 2009-10-15 08:20:00 | Who will be participating? | convair (13650) | ||
| 813791 | 2009-10-15 08:21:00 | Looking at the list: Erayd the_bogan Sweep Cato ... and you if you're interested. |
somebody (208) | ||
| 813792 | 2009-10-15 08:31:00 | Since there's only 4 people, maybe we could do it as a 2 on 2 debate? Shorter turnaround times, and maybe a topic that doesn't require too much research? A two on two works for me but it would depend on the moot would it not? For example I know very little about a lot of subjects but have general knowledge on some. Research has to be done to put the arguement (debate) in my view otherwise you may not have a clue as to what points to put forward. |
Sweep (90) | ||
| 813793 | 2009-10-15 08:35:00 | So Jimm and one more maybe. Which would make it three on three.. | Sweep (90) | ||
| 813794 | 2009-10-15 08:42:00 | Im keen and think there needs to be some research for the debate to achieve its purpose | convair (13650) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||