| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 103838 | 2009-10-08 01:25:00 | Defacto Relationships | convair (13650) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 817932 | 2009-10-08 01:25:00 | If have have been with my current partner for 4 years and all of a sudden the relationship ends. Is she entitled to half of everything that I own? | convair (13650) | ||
| 817933 | 2009-10-08 01:27:00 | Yeah, exactly as if you were married. | Cato (6936) | ||
| 817934 | 2009-10-08 01:37:00 | Saw this on a rental van in Oz last month "Divorce = The right to drag his balls through his wallett" | Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 817935 | 2009-10-08 01:43:00 | If have have been with my current partner for 4 years and all of a sudden the relationship ends. Is she entitled to half of everything that I own?It depends ... www.howtolaw.co.nz Separate property remains separate In general, separate property (that is, all property not classed as relationship property) remains the property of the person who owns it and is not divided. It includes - property that the parties owned before the marriage, civil union or relationship began and that they kept separate during it any gifts and inheritances that the parties received during the marriage, civil union or relationship and that they kept separate Separate property also includes all property acquired out of separate property, and the proceeds of selling any separate property. But if an increase in the value of one party’s separate property, or any income or gains derived from the property, is caused wholly or partly by the "application" of relationship property, then the increase, or the income or gains, is relationship property, not separate property. Similarly, if an increase in the value of one party’s separate property, or any income or gains derived from the property, is caused wholly or party by the actions of the other party, the increase, or the income or gains, is treated as relationship property, and is divided according to each party’s contributions to the increase. This applies whether the other party’s actions caused the increase directly or indirectly. |
KiwiTT_NZ (233) | ||
| 817936 | 2009-10-08 04:00:00 | The woman will take everything anyway. They have the blessing of the system that keeps broken families broken. | rob_on_guitar (4196) | ||
| 817937 | 2009-10-08 04:22:00 | If have have been with my current partner for 4 years and all of a sudden the relationship ends. Is she entitled to half of everything that I own? It depends if you had her sign a wavier or some form of prenup at the beginning of the relationship. If she was the reason for it ending, eg she cheated on you, I don't beleive she is entitled to as much, as if it was a mutural ending. Lawyers will win the most, if things get ugly, so I would try to keep it civil. Sometimes the woman can end up with over 60% and the house and car if their are children involved, so be careful. |
robbyp (2751) | ||
| 817938 | 2009-10-08 04:46:00 | Is there kids involved? If not then youl most likely lose half, if theres kids then almost definitely half if not more | hueybot3000 (3646) | ||
| 817939 | 2009-10-08 04:49:00 | One of the things you think about very seriously before getting into a relationship rather than after. | Sweep (90) | ||
| 817940 | 2009-10-08 04:51:00 | It depends if you had her sign a wavier or some form of prenup at the beginning of the relationship. Doesn't always work. If it goes to court there will always be someone treated unfairly and they will be granted consideration in one way or another. |
Cato (6936) | ||
| 817941 | 2009-10-08 04:58:00 | Where is Greg? I'm sure he could give a little advice, albeit not in De Facto. | bob_doe_nz (92) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |||||