Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 104518	2009-10-30 03:15:00	Pricespy	Metla (12)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
825522	2009-10-31 00:39:00	dont like it at all change it back !	brendanBiggs (14637)
825523	2009-10-31 03:18:00	Dont really care, preferred it how it was but Ive just done my big shop so i dont need to look at for a year or 2	hueybot3000 (3646)
825524	2009-10-31 06:42:00	We hates it we does. We do not finds it precious no mores. tis bad as those nasty hobbits.	porkster (6331)
825525	2009-10-31 08:10:00	I started using it about 3 weeks ago during the beta phase. I think it's a good evolution of the format, allowing for more sophisticated assessment of the information. Sure there are some bugs to work out - for example, when using lists and identifying the lowest price configuration, the stores with stock are called" stores" but those without are called "butiker". What is "butiker"? The lists can be a little shaky some times, and there's a bit of refinement needed to facilitate navigation once you start using the advanced features, but on the whole, it's an interesting step forward.	Lizard (2409)
825526	2009-10-31 10:31:00	I started using it about 3 weeks ago during the beta phase. I think it's a good evolution of the format, allowing for more sophisticated assessment of the information. Sure there are some bugs to work out - for example, when using lists and identifying the lowest price configuration, the stores with stock are called" stores" but those without are called "butiker". What is "butiker"? The lists can be a little shaky some times, and there's a bit of refinement needed to facilitate navigation once you start using the advanced features, but on the whole, it's an interesting step forward. Whether it is a step forward, a step backwards, or a step sideways, is questionable. To me, it is far too cluttered, complex, and not the nicest looking of modern looking of designs. New web designs are using the google approach of 'less is more'. Basically it is more difficult to use than the older one and requires more time and clicks to get where you want. The old one worked fine. If it ain't broke.	robbyp (2751)
825527	2009-11-01 09:49:00	It's missing the store type, ie online or retail. I couldn't see it anyway. Important for me, because I avoid online sellers	Phil B (648)
825528	2009-11-01 10:08:00	Unable to connect Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at www.pricespy.co.nz. * The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments. * If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection. * If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web. Yeah not so keen on it.	roddy_boy (4115)
825529	2009-11-01 11:47:00	It sucks for now but hopefully when everything is sorted it will redeem itself. My main problem is that the categories/filters suck compared to the old ones, although they do provide for better searching. This should get better with time However they need to do something about the CPU usage and the fact that it is a bit sucky overall.. once it gets used to itself, it might be quite good though	Agent_24 (57)
825530	2009-11-02 03:59:00	Wow, what a shock! I thought I was on another site this morning when I visited Pricespy. Not sure whether I like the new site or not. The old site did exactly what it was designed to do: easy comparison of prices. The new site takes a while to get use to I guess. I do like the search, and the filtering is pretty cool even though it takes up most of my screen. I think the new site looks more like Priceme (http://www.priceme.co.nz), just more cluttered. And no prices shown above the fold.	boogey (15390)
825531	2009-11-02 04:10:00	I think the new site looks more like Priceme, just more cluttered. And no prices shown above the fold.And what's your financial interest in Priceme that you have to spam the url on these forums?	Greg (193)
1 2 3 4 5 6