| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 105008 | 2009-11-16 02:28:00 | MPAA forces small town to turn off it's Wi-Fi | baabits (15242) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 830637 | 2009-11-16 02:28:00 | www.atomicmpc.com.au A small town in the US is paying the price of not standing up to the MPAA. Coshocton, which is in Ohio and does not have a great tradition of standing up to authority, decided that it would be a wizard wheeze to turn control of its municipal network over to the movie companies' cartel. After all it did not want any nasty 'pirates' in its fine little town, it wanted only plain decent folk who buy lots of gingham and bake lots of apple pies. Imagine its shock when the MPAA forced the town to shut down its entire free municipal WiFi network because of a single instance of a single user illegally downloading a copyrighted movie. We are not talking a big network here. Sometimes it handles 100 people a day during busy times. The closure of the network means that the Coshocton County Sheriff's deputies can't complete a traffic or incident report and out-of-town business people can't park in town and use their laptops to connect to the Internet. Because the whole network has a single IP address, the town did not know who the pirate was, so the MPAA demanded that the network be shut off. The case is fairly typical of what has been happening on a wider scale across the world. The MPAA and its music industry cousin the RIAA have been running around, lobbying about the perils of 'piracy' and screaming that they'll be forced out of business and Western civilisation will fall unless peer-to-peer filesharing is stamped out or everyone even suspected of copyright infringement is hounded, fined, booted off the Internet or all of the above plus criminalised. Rather than engage their brains and tell the entertainment companies along with the RIAA and MPAA to go forth and multiply, politicians seem to want to roll over and give the entertainment industries everything they want. France was prepared to switch off Internet connections to those the MPAA and RIAA said were 'pirates'. It was only when it was pointed out that this was against the constitution without due process of law that the government backed down, partly. In the US, the RIAA has been litigious and made a fool of itself by dragging children, the elderly and dead people into court to face 'piracy' charges. In other words we are not dealing with nice people, we are dealing with bullies and stick-up artists, much like common muggers except they wear suits. We elect people to protect us from such things. Society is supposed to collectvely stand up against the overly aggressive to see that weaker people can thrive and make their contributions as well. The shutting down of a small town network is a microcosm of what the entertainment industry would do to the Internet if we give it control. Rather than protecting us, lawmakers are happy to give in and switch off whoever the RIAA, MPAA and their cronies point to. In this case it was a whole town, but why not all the users of an ISP, a cable firm, mobile carrier or telecom? It is clearly time for the body politic to tell these clowns to go away. Any sympathy they might have attracted in their war against 'piracy' they have squandered by their greedy, self-serving, neurotic and paranoid behaviour As much as piracy is a bad thing and it affects profits, my mind wanders when I see movie stars and popular artists with million dollar mansions and flash cars.. You really wonder just how much they lose compared to how much they gain.. Is piracy actually starting to become the majority's way of getting access to movies and music? Or are they just drama queens flopping around for small change compared to what they get? :confused: |
baabits (15242) | ||
| 830638 | 2009-11-16 02:35:00 | I think this is more a matter of the idiocy of terminating internet accounts for piracy - you don't cut off a town's electricity because one person is using power for making drugs. For all intents and purposes, the municipal WiFi is like any other utility, and should be treated as such. |
somebody (208) | ||
| 830639 | 2009-11-16 03:50:00 | I think this is more a matter of the idiocy of terminating internet accounts for piracy - you don't cut off a town's electricity because one person is using power for making drugs. For all intents and purposes, the municipal WiFi is like any other utility, and should be treated as such. Excellent analogy! :thumbs: |
johcar (6283) | ||
| 830640 | 2009-11-16 03:51:00 | Excellent analogy! :thumbs: x2, very well put! |
wratterus (105) | ||
| 830641 | 2009-11-16 04:08:00 | You thought a small town was bad? Quoted from a game forum in April 2009. "We regret to inform our members that due to massive traffic from Icelandic IPs due to infection by the Conficker worm, we have been forced to ban all Icelandic IP addresses in order to preserve the continued existence of the forum. The Invision admins have been notified but are presently unable to offer any alternatives." |
the_bogan (9949) | ||
| 830642 | 2009-11-16 09:41:00 | ITS | roddy_boy (4115) | ||
| 1 | |||||