Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 105773 2009-12-13 21:51:00 Is this being totally irresponsible? tuiruru (12277) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
839327 2009-12-13 23:06:00 19 offspring invites a multitude of species options. R2x1 (4628)
839328 2009-12-13 23:10:00 I bet they are religious. prefect (6291)
839329 2009-12-13 23:14:00 Environment view?....LOL, Christ, you dont listen to that PC BS do you?, there are millions of childless families, you don't need to worry about population 0 in the western world, only the 3rd world as they cant support themselves.
It's not PC BS Sol. Americans have the highest affluence levels per individual than any other country. They consume the largest amount of resources per individual. If I remember correctly, one American child consumes as much as 30x that of an average Indian man.

Population wise, correct, we don't need to worry about pop growth as much in the western world, but in America pop growth can be quite worrying, especially given their affluence and thus their affects on resources supply and environmental damage.

Not bashing you Surfer! I'm sure you do your bit for the greens round ya! :D
qazwsxokmijn (102)
839330 2009-12-13 23:47:00 It's not PC BS Sol. Americans have the highest affluence levels per individual than any other country. They consume the largest amount of resources per individual. If I remember correctly, one American child consumes as much as 30x that of an average Indian man.

Population wise, correct, we don't need to worry about pop growth as much in the western world, but in America pop growth can be quite worrying, especially given their affluence and thus their affects on resources supply and environmental damage.

Not bashing you Surfer! I'm sure you do your bit for the greens round ya! :D

This is a very religious family. I doubt very much a household of this size can afford to be 30x more resource hungry than an Indian....Its not like the PI family up in Auckland who live off everyone else, and I dont give a monkeys what any environmentalist says, 1), I dont believe anything they say of late, 2) if I did I could only worry about my own impact not anyone else's. 3) I like to think they have a very strong family, something not seen too often nowadays.
SolMiester (139)
839331 2009-12-14 00:53:00 I bet they are good catholics. convair (13650)
839332 2009-12-14 01:00:00 I bet they are good catholics.

+1
xyz823 (13649)
839333 2009-12-14 03:09:00 If the children (all of 'em) are godly enough, can she claim she's a virgin?

Or is one the practical limit?
R2x1 (4628)
839334 2009-12-14 03:36:00 If the children (all of 'em) are godly enough, can she claim she's a virgin?

Or is one the practical limit?

I think, if we're talking about a PRACTICAL limit to determine virginity, NONE is probably a better number to use.

Even then, that's no guarantee. :)

The most famous (arguably) documented virgin birth is a matter of faith...
johcar (6283)
839335 2009-12-14 04:56:00 Unlike current trends, in that mostly unsupportable case the stepfather turned out to be a far better parent than the real father. (If "real" is even faintly applicable in this case). R2x1 (4628)
839336 2009-12-14 05:36:00 Can have as many as they like,so long as I (we) don't have to support them. Cicero (40)
1 2 3