| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 106272 | 2010-01-03 05:04:00 | Tagger Killer To Be Freed | Twelvevolts (5457) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 845147 | 2010-01-03 20:28:00 | So what? You justify a killing because he possibly might have sprayed a wall previously?? So if it was the first time he sprayed a wall - would you have settled for life imprisonment or would the death penalty still have been your chosen solution? And would there be any age restriction on your sentencing regime? Would you put a six year old to death for the same thing? So looks like Sensible Sentencing means the death penalty for any allegation over any offence at any age . Gee - your world sounds like a really fun place to live . Never said anything of the sort, was just stating that just because you haven't been caught by police before, doesn't mean your not a criminal |
plod (107) | ||
| 845148 | 2010-01-03 20:31:00 | Well I suspect if your son was murdered on the street you'd think a little differently about it. Obviously you don't care about the victim in this case despite all your hot air to the contrary on other cases. And as the Police say "That is the tragedy of it. The victim has been portrayed as this evil little kid that has been running around. But that wasn't the case at all, he was never in trouble with the police" But then he had the Sensible Sentencing Trust going to work on him, little thought for the victim on this occasion, cuddled up with the killer. Bunch of hypocrites, shows the SST don't really care about victims at all. The tagger was not murdered on the street so your analogy leaves a lot to be desired. |
Sweep (90) | ||
| 845149 | 2010-01-03 20:36:00 | Who do you believe? (www.3news.co.nz) | andrew93 (249) | ||
| 845150 | 2010-01-03 20:38:00 | I think the term for killing crooks while they are committing a crime is called summary justice. Like when police or army in NZ can shoot looters on sight. Consideration must be given to how angry people get when they see crooks committing a crime. Thats why imo the guy shouldn't have gone to jail but be lauded as a hero in the fight against crime. Bit like the defence of crime of passion they have in some countries where it is ok to shoot when you see your wife in bed with another man. volts the SST is the voice of real NZ get used to it or you will get all wound up and die of a heart attack from the stress of fighting progress. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 845151 | 2010-01-03 20:44:00 | So if it is OK to kill people for painting a wall - where is your threshold when it isn't OK? Presumably you don't favour killing people for jaywalking? Then again - who ever thought people would endorse the death penalty for spray painting a wall - without a trial as well . One can only wonder what makes you so fearful of tagging that you support the death penalty for it without trial . Not the tagging,it's the blatant disregard of others rights . |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 845152 | 2010-01-03 20:50:00 | Not the tagging,it's the blatant disregard of others rights . Oh I see - you support the death penalty for disregarding rights . What rights are we referring to? The right to have a clean wall? So would throwing an egg at a wall also require the death penalty? We've had a rash of college students here throwing eggs at houses, do they all deserve to die as well?? |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 845153 | 2010-01-03 21:00:00 | Oh I see - you support the death penalty for disregarding rights. What rights are we referring to? The right to have a clean wall? So would throwing an egg at a wall also require the death penalty? We've had a rash of college students here throwing eggs at houses, do they all deserve to die as well?? Sigh. You keep bringing up the death penalty. We don't have the death penalty in New Zealand or has something changed overnight? While I generally don't agree with the death penalty I would have no problem with it in certain cases. |
Sweep (90) | ||
| 845154 | 2010-01-03 21:01:00 | I think the term for killing crooks while they are committing a crime is called summary justice . Like when police or army in NZ can shoot looters on sight . Consideration must be given to how angry people get when they see crooks committing a crime . Thats why imo the guy shouldn't have gone to jail but be lauded as a hero in the fight against crime . Bit like the defence of crime of passion they have in some countries where it is ok to shoot when you see your wife in bed with another man . volts the SST is the voice of real NZ get used to it or you will get all wound up and die of a heart attack from the stress of fighting progress . Imagine how angry you might get if your son was killed in the street . My son was assaulted in the street the other day (the offender has gone to court) so I have recent experience of a young person being assaulted, and appreciate under your warped thinking he could now be dead . No - I recall the last time you National Socialist types got power in a country, it started with summary justice and ended with concentration camps . |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 845155 | 2010-01-03 21:06:00 | Sigh. You keep bringing up the death penalty. We don't have the death penalty in New Zealand or has something changed overnight? While I generally don't agree with the death penalty I would have no problem with it in certain cases. Well the tagger was killed and certain people here think that was justified that he should have died for spraying a wall. We don't have the death penalty now and neither do we want it. However, if we have the "summary justice" Prefect proposes, you'd be able to kill anyone you thought had committed a crime. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 845156 | 2010-01-03 21:09:00 | 12 v - what are you drinking and/or smoking? Your level of comprehension is way off mark :( |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | |||||