| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 106272 | 2010-01-03 05:04:00 | Tagger Killer To Be Freed | Twelvevolts (5457) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 845137 | 2010-01-03 08:58:00 | Well these sentence things are up to individual interpretation. There is always the death penalty. Some would agree with that and live in a country that involves that, some people who do live there or not in those countries don't agree ..... |
Nomad (952) | ||
| 845138 | 2010-01-03 09:00:00 | It was a travesty the guy was sent to prison at all. It was, If you look into this a little, lundy and his family were the victims of: racist, gang targeting, and intimidation. As usual in these matter's, of long police inaction, only the finall unfortunate serious incident, recieves any police or media attention. |
angry (15305) | ||
| 845139 | 2010-01-03 09:28:00 | What a load of crap. | Zippity (58) | ||
| 845140 | 2010-01-03 10:51:00 | It was a travesty the guy was sent to prison at all. Well I suspect if your son was murdered on the street you'd think a little differently about it. Obviously you don't care about the victim in this case despite all your hot air to the contrary on other cases. And as the Police say "That is the tragedy of it. The victim has been portrayed as this evil little kid that has been running around. But that wasn't the case at all, he was never in trouble with the police" But then he had the Sensible Sentencing Trust going to work on him, little thought for the victim on this occasion, cuddled up with the killer. Bunch of hypocrites, shows the SST don't really care about victims at all. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 845141 | 2010-01-03 11:05:00 | We can thank the SST for pitching in to help real victims not tagger vandals, they are called criminals not victims. Need to sort your terminology out calling a criminal a victim is bad juju. I am pretty sure most people would think criminals getting taken out during their execution of a crime is good karma. I could be wrong though I am a bit of a redneck. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 845142 | 2010-01-03 17:24:00 | A "bit"?? | Greg (193) | ||
| 845143 | 2010-01-03 19:27:00 | I agree with Prefect. I note the tagger has not re-offended. Which we will agree is a good thing. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 845144 | 2010-01-03 19:36:00 | And as the Police say "That is the tragedy of it . The victim has been portrayed as this evil little kid that has been running around . But that wasn't the case at all, he was never in trouble with the police" . All that says is that he was never caught doing anything by the police . So the saying must be true "If I don't get caught, I didn't do anything wrong" |
plod (107) | ||
| 845145 | 2010-01-03 20:16:00 | I agree with Prefect . I note the tagger has not re-offended . Which we will agree is a good thing . So if it is ok to kill people for painting a wall - where is your threshold when it isn't ok? Presumably you don't favour killing people for jaywalking? Then again - who ever thought people would endorse the death penalty for spray painting a wall - without a trial as well . One can only wonder what makes you so fearful of tagging that you support the death penalty for it without trial . |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 845146 | 2010-01-03 20:24:00 | All that says is that he was never caught doing anything by the police . So the saying must be true "If I don't get caught, I didn't do anything wrong" So what? You justify a killing because he possibly might have sprayed a wall previously?? So if it was the first time he sprayed a wall - would you have settled for life imprisonment or would the death penalty still have been your chosen solution? And would there be any age restriction on your sentencing regime? Would you put a six year old to death for the same thing? So looks like Sensible Sentencing means the death penalty for any allegation over any offence at any age . Gee - your world sounds like a really fun place to live . |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | |||||