Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 106436	2010-01-08 06:50:00	driving on wrong side of the road in NZ okay?	lance4k (4644)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
847035	2010-01-09 07:17:00	According to angrys logic, every time we go through a green light or anywhere we have the right of way, or pretty much do anything legal, we can still be done for dangerous/careless driving. So EVERYONE in a crash is at fault because they didn't avoid it? And you do not lose your license for driving through a red light, and it's still seldom to lose it for dangerous driving. Grow up angry and stop posting bs.	--Wolf-- (128)
847036	2010-01-09 07:52:00	How much money would you like to put on that?????? is one of the phraseologys in: inconsiderate/careless/ dangerous, use of a motor vehicle. IE the use of the vehicle was careless in that the operator did not try to avoid a collision because he had legall right of way. common at red light running, 2 people see red light runner and stop. no 3 dosent stop, and screams I HAD RIGHT OF WAY, after he collides with red light runner, he could clearly see, and should have avoided. 1 get written up for running red light, damgerous driving, other for, carless use "failure to avoid". both will lose licences. :horrified . What planet in the galaxy prosecutes people who were in the right in a collision?	prefect (6291)
847037	2010-01-09 09:31:00	The planet with angry on it ;)	R2x1 (4628)
847038	2010-01-09 09:33:00	According to angrys logic, every time we go through a green light or anywhere we have the right of way, or pretty much do anything legal, we can still be done for dangerous/careless driving. So EVERYONE in a crash is at fault because they didn't avoid it? And you do not lose your license for driving through a red light, and it's still seldom to lose it for dangerous driving. Grow up angry and stop posting bs. we will start with you, because you are the easiest. Dangerous driving carries a MANDATORY 6 MONTH DISQUALIFICATION. LEARN YOUR ROAD LAW. If you have the legall right of way, and you take it, when it was/is unsafe to do so, and an avoidable collision occours, you are no longer in the right, because you failed to exersise "due care". Thats the way it is, which in due course you will learn. :)	angry (15305)
847039	2010-01-09 09:39:00	You can't get done for carless use. Let's say I see a vehicle coming though the red light and stop in a hurry. The following vehicle collides with the rear of my car. Am I careless as I should have seen the vehicle behind me? NO, the Vehicle behind you was following to close, which is why it hit you (or the driver wasnt paying attention) and the driver is guilty of, careless use. did you read my post as the driver of car 3 hitting one of the two stopped cars, or the red light runner ?? I meant it as car 3, striking red light runner.	angry (15305)
847040	2010-01-09 09:42:00	I do remember writing a ticket for driving in a manner that may be dangerous to the public some time back. About 20 miles per hour he was doing but that was on the footpath and pedestrians were moving on to the road.	Sweep (90)
847041	2010-01-09 09:44:00	What planet in the galaxy prosecutes people who were in the right in a collision? none. car 3 did not exersise due care, an so struck red light runner, both are wrong. car 3 was not paying attention to what was happening around him/her, should have seen others stopping odly and exersised caution (slowed down, looked more carefully prepared to avoid (:)all things that MUST be done at every intersection)), thus avoiding collision.	angry (15305)
847042	2010-01-09 09:46:00	I do remember writing a ticket for driving in a manner that may be dangerous to the public some time back. About 20 miles per hour he was doing but that was on the footpath and pedestrians were moving on to the road. did you obtain a conviction??? :dogeye:	angry (15305)
847043	2010-01-09 09:49:00	did you obtain a conviction??? :dogeye: Yes. It was a guilty plea anyway.	Sweep (90)
847044	2010-01-09 19:34:00	There is no such traffic offence in NZ of not exercising due care, maybe Albania or the Belgian Congo have such a law and you got confused.	prefect (6291)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8