| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 106625 | 2010-01-16 05:42:00 | Stupid question or what? | martynz (5445) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 849203 | 2010-01-16 05:42:00 | Found this on another forum.. "I realise this is likely to be a rather contentitious question and I hope it does not get answered by any internet company representatives ! Would any one consider it safer to switch from wireless on our home computor to wired ( via phone line ). Is this likely to lessen exposure to any possible effects on the body from wireless exposure ? Theres some rather disturbing information popping up out there. I do hope its possible to have some informed honest debate on this ?" I think the best preventative is to wear an aluminium foil hat. Martynz |
martynz (5445) | ||
| 849204 | 2010-01-16 05:47:00 | What evidence do you have,that the foil hat is effective? | Cicero (40) | ||
| 849205 | 2010-01-16 05:53:00 | Found this on another forum . . "I realise this is likely to be a rather contentitious question and I hope it does not get answered by any internet company representatives ! Would any one consider it safer to switch from wireless on our home computor to wired ( via phone line ) . Is this likely to lessen exposure to any possible effects on the body from wireless exposure ? Theres some rather disturbing information popping up out there . I do hope its possible to have some informed honest debate on this ?" I think the best preventative is to wear an aluminium foil hat . Martynz Is the internet safer via the phonline compared to mobile based? Sure . It's always more secure . But at the end of the day, not to the extent any normal person should care . Unless you are CIA/FBI/Al Quida or Hitler reborn . And still you ain't safe from the boys over at ECHELON watching you anyway . As far as cellphone technologies giving you cancer or something like that, probably . But in saying that, would it stop you from using cellphones? (Wireless Broadband is HSDPA/W-CDMA - what we got in our phones) |
Cato (6936) | ||
| 849206 | 2010-01-16 06:09:00 | What evidence do you have,that the foil hat is effective? An alien told me. Martynz |
martynz (5445) | ||
| 849207 | 2010-01-16 06:18:00 | An alien told me. Martynz Don't rat me out. I said no such thing! |
Sweep (90) | ||
| 849208 | 2010-01-16 06:40:00 | The foil hat on its own (unearthed) will act as a spherical antenna, and because it is open (ie not a Faraday shield) is likely to concentrate the radiation towards the centre of the brain.............:rolleyes: | Terry Porritt (14) | ||
| 849209 | 2010-01-16 07:00:00 | What evidence do you have,that the foil hat is effective? I have totally avoided radiation and other zaps while wearing my foil hat with ornamental flowerpot attachment (for earthing purposes), on the other hand, while devoid of the shielded hat I have only narrowly escaped some nefarious rays. I am still a little unsure of the correct procedure re foil hats in thunderstorms. As a precaution I carry a Lucas badge, thereby rendering the lightning powerless. |
R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 849210 | 2010-01-16 08:00:00 | Foil hats should be worn upside down in thunderstorms to collect refreshing acid rain water, which can then be used to melt down the Lucas badge into a fancy diet shake therefore rendering you completely harmless to thunderstorms. However if you wear said foil hat on your feet all it will do is deviate the acid rain water into your gummies where it will mix with the stench of melted socks and create nuclear fusion. At which time you will be deported to the USA as a health hazard to whales | gary67 (56) | ||
| 849211 | 2010-01-16 08:03:00 | Drat. Back to the drawing board. | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 849212 | 2010-01-16 09:07:00 | An alien told me. Martynz Ah good,that's OK then,was sceptical there for a minute. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||