| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 107424 | 2010-02-15 09:50:00 | So how does Name Supression work? | bob_doe_nz (92) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 858712 | 2010-02-15 09:50:00 | So, they removed the suppression on a suspect in the Pickering case but you cannot show his picture. But it's on the Herald (www.nzherald.co.nz) and ZB (www.newstalkzb.co.nz) website. :confused::confused::confused::confused::confused: Even more interesting is how they managed to pull up his mugshot. |
bob_doe_nz (92) | ||
| 858713 | 2010-02-15 10:39:00 | It doesn't really work- Just another perversion of justice... | beeswax34 (63) | ||
| 858714 | 2010-02-15 10:44:00 | But that was before the mug shot supression. Personally I am getting annoyed that the media reports names at all until conviction and certainly not things like "A teacher at XYZ school has been charged with ZYX". The school has been identified and it casts doubt on ALL the teachers at that named school regardless of guilt or innocence. In the event of a charge being leveled at a certain person then it should be over to the Justice system to advise the school, company or the employer that the person has been charged and that particular person is in custody or on bail as the case may be. I note that Police officers have been suspended on full pay while the so called system grinds very slowly on. Further to that I see that the media are not quick to publish the not guilty verdicts in general. |
Sweep (90) | ||
| 858715 | 2010-02-15 16:33:00 | What they could do is name all the teachers at the school who are NOT suspects! :lol: | Greg (193) | ||
| 858716 | 2010-02-15 19:43:00 | Further to that I see that the media are not quick to publish the not guilty verdicts in general. Thats because "not guilty" is not news.....parasites |
Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 858717 | 2010-02-15 21:42:00 | Thats because "not guilty" is not news.....parasites Except when there is mass amounts of moolah involved! |
bob_doe_nz (92) | ||
| 858718 | 2010-02-15 21:48:00 | What they could do is name all the teachers at the school who are NOT suspects! :lol: Which by default identifies the person charged. Bear in mind that person may not be guilty anyway as it has not yet been proven. |
Sweep (90) | ||
| 858719 | 2010-02-16 05:01:00 | Which by default identifies the person charged. Bear in mind that person may not be guilty anyway as it has not yet been proven. Yes, thank you Captain Obvious. I think that was meant to be a joke :p |
beeswax34 (63) | ||
| 858720 | 2010-02-16 06:37:00 | It doesn't really work- Just another perversion of justice... I agree. There should be name suppression for everyone until they are convicted and then none unless the rare circumstances require it. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 858721 | 2010-02-16 06:40:00 | I'm suppressing my surname on this forum :D | gary67 (56) | ||
| 1 | |||||