| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 108181 | 2010-03-17 06:02:00 | Waihopai "SPY" base | Happy Harry (321) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 867976 | 2010-03-17 06:02:00 | The politics aside, how can the NZ courts find these guys not guilty of intentional damage to the dome. They were caught on site, with the sickles and rakes and a bloody great hole cut in the side of the protective bubble. The hole wasn't caused by some kamikaze Magpie!! It pisses me off that the damage done by these guys, now has to be paid for by the average Joe blow taxpayer That these 3 believe that this satellite dish causes harm is really beside the point. I believe that the 2 young guys at the end of my road are eventually going to kill someone with their stupid driving, but that does not give me the right to go and destroy their cars to prevent this happening. I admire their conviction to their cause but not their trampling of everyone else’s rights to not have to pay for their vandalism. HH |
Happy Harry (321) | ||
| 867977 | 2010-03-17 06:08:00 | Quite agree with you. These people were guilty. :) |
Trev (427) | ||
| 867978 | 2010-03-17 06:34:00 | Beats me. Now every Greenie idiot will be trying the same defence for property damage. | CliveM (6007) | ||
| 867979 | 2010-03-17 07:18:00 | Just retry them and retry them until found guilty then deport them. | prefect (6291) | ||
| 867980 | 2010-03-17 07:42:00 | This ain't vandalism it's terrorism. | Cato (6936) | ||
| 867981 | 2010-03-17 07:44:00 | No, this isn't terrorism, it's high treason. | Cato (6936) | ||
| 867982 | 2010-03-17 07:46:00 | If they're "not" guilty, then they should be "not" hung (a bit) for a day or two to ponder on the error of their ways | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 867983 | 2010-03-17 07:48:00 | Not this is liberal BS. If John Key proposes to send troops to Iraq, and I kill him to prevent this from happening and prevent kiwi soldiers from killing terrorists, will I be acquitted? What if I blow up a plane taking troops to Iraq? I shouldn't be, I should be hung. Not for murder, but for treason. |
Cato (6936) | ||
| 867984 | 2010-03-17 07:58:00 | I say good on them. | plod (107) | ||
| 867985 | 2010-03-17 08:40:00 | I say good on them. Hey Plod I have no problems with these guys protesting, but have huge problems with them destroying public/crown property. Why do you say "Good on them" It does not make any sense for these guys to destroy public/crown property/taxpayers and then just get away with it. If you then extrapolate agreement wuth their actions, then it is then quite acceptable for anyone who does not agree with the beliefs of these 3, to go and shoot the farmers cows, destroy the gardeners vegies and fruit and burn down the church of the monk/priest. I can not accept that these peoples beliefs allow then to damage/destroy property without redress. Cheers HH |
Happy Harry (321) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||