Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 108181	2010-03-17 06:02:00	Waihopai "SPY" base	Happy Harry (321)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
867986	2010-03-17 08:44:00	I say good on them. WHY.	BobM (1138)
867987	2010-03-17 08:53:00	Blame the Jury I say.	Sweep (90)
867988	2010-03-17 09:28:00	WHY. for once it wasn't the rich upper class getting off with a good lawyer (Did I word that right?) Hell, I would like too know what goes on in that place, and its sorted my next defense next time I need one. Its almost as good as the provocation defense	plod (107)
867989	2010-03-17 10:03:00	for once it wasn't the rich upper class getting off with a good lawyer (Did I word that right?) WTH. No.	BobM (1138)
867990	2010-03-17 10:13:00	In this case the defence worked for the defendants. The Prosecution may have not actually proved the case in spite of admissions by the not guilty parties.	Sweep (90)
867991	2010-03-17 10:44:00	Don't blame the Jury. Blame the stinkin' Labour Government that phuked up our legal system............	Zippity (58)
867992	2010-03-17 17:55:00	for once it wasn't the rich upper class getting off with a good lawyer (Did I word that right?) Yes you did and I can see where your coming from even though I disagree with the verdict, it is good to see you don't have to be rich to get a good lawyer, hope you got his name for if you ever need one	gary67 (56)
867993	2010-03-17 19:17:00	I thought that ignorance of the law was no excuse, but in this case they pleaded ignorance and were acquitted. Does that mean we can all plead ignorance and get away with almost anything? Seems like it.:horrified	Roscoe (6288)
867994	2010-03-17 19:18:00	Bloody hippies EDIT: they represented themselves didnt they??	Gobe1 (6290)
867995	2010-03-17 19:30:00	No doubt they were on legal aid as well so the tax payer pays twice. Once for the damage they caused and once for their defense..	paulw (1826)
1 2 3 4