| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 110464 | 2010-06-18 00:31:00 | Telecom to pay $120,000 for misleading advertising | Trev (427) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1111174 | 2010-06-18 00:31:00 | Here. (www.nzherald.co.nz) Who do they think they are ? :) |
Trev (427) | ||
| 1111175 | 2010-06-18 01:17:00 | Ah yes well I remember these plans well, and was fairly mad as it sucked in old people (who the hell can surf for a month on 200MB). Telecom are now reaping the rewards of everything they have sown for the last 10 years, there share price is directly proportionate to how they have treated NZ consumers imo. ohh should add Telecom did this to boost broadband uptake numbers to make it look good for the government :P |
Battleneter2 (9361) | ||
| 1111176 | 2010-06-18 01:30:00 | Helping to fund something which will promote competitors' broadband pricing, that's gotta be salt in the wound :p | pablo d (15490) | ||
| 1111177 | 2010-06-18 02:12:00 | $120,000? A mere drop in the bucket. They will ask the receptionist to take it out of her petty cash - just 24% of one day's profit!:illogical Previous misdemeanors have attracted fines of a similar amount. It's about time Telecom was held to a realistic account. They should have to pay back 24% of a week's profit at least - $3,360,000 according to my calculations based on a profit of $14m - $2m per day. |
Roscoe (6288) | ||
| 1111178 | 2010-06-18 05:31:00 | . . . misleading advertising . Why are people picking on Telecom for this? It is not as if it is a major (for them) transgression, or even an "out of character" performance . They are merely putting their mouth where their heart is and doing what they have always done - what has changed? |
R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1111179 | 2010-06-18 05:57:00 | Why are people picking on Telecom for this? It is not as if it is a major (for them) transgression, or even an "out of character" performance. They are merely putting their mouth where their heart is and doing what they have always done - what has changed? no its not a "major" transgression for them, hell at least they are being consistent ah :xmouth: |
Battleneter2 (9361) | ||
| 1111180 | 2010-06-18 06:03:00 | Right, lets get this sorted, Someone display a picture of the CEO fishing, That should do it,Super rich Scottich Twat on a luxury holiday, All warm and fuzzy, go on, give us a go....... |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1111181 | 2010-06-18 07:32:00 | It may be more serious than that - maybe it will take a Logo transplant. | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1111182 | 2010-06-18 10:01:00 | And while we are talking about bozos at Telecom, why do they allow the news media to photograph /film something as non-technical as the photo shown here? Do they want to look as though they are still in the pre-internet days?? |
decibel (11645) | ||
| 1111183 | 2010-06-18 22:09:00 | Ah yes well I remember these plans well, and was fairly mad as it sucked in old people (who the hell can surf for a month on 200MB) . Telecom are now reaping the rewards of everything they have sown for the last 10 years, there share price is directly proportionate to how they have treated NZ consumers imo . ohh should add Telecom did this to boost broadband uptake numbers to make it look good for the government :P Many people can do with 200mb a month, I see it all the time . Not every one downloads pirated music, videos and does online gaming or look at places like youtube . |
wainuitech (129) | ||
| 1 2 3 | |||||