| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 110410 | 2010-06-16 02:10:00 | Sicko judge | prefect (6291) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1110578 | 2010-06-16 09:14:00 | I can't wrap my head around the fact that if you attack,cripple, or kill a person with your car its a lesser crime. They should call it the same as if you walked into the street and fired a gun. As for the cop, They should never be put under less scrutiny then everyone else, who the hell are they to restrict what others do if they themselves don't follow the rules? That is exactly why they don't get the respect, and its a craphole as many of them deserve respect. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1110579 | 2010-06-16 09:52:00 | I can't wrap my head around the fact that if you attack,cripple, or kill a person with your car its a lesser crime. Because accidents happen? |
--Wolf-- (128) | ||
| 1110580 | 2010-06-16 09:56:00 | Did she accidentally get pissed, then decide to go for burgers? | KarameaDave (15222) | ||
| 1110581 | 2010-06-16 10:02:00 | Because accidents happen? Incidents, and they are always caused by the actions of the guilty person. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1110582 | 2010-06-16 10:03:00 | Bloody victims, who the hell do they think they are with all their pain and suffering aye? Lets attack them. I'm sure she'd feel a whole lot better if the offender got shot, I can see how that works at healing the pain. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 1110583 | 2010-06-16 10:09:00 | Incidents, and they are always caused by the actions of the guilty person. Never mind car failure, road conditions etc? I remember there used to be a program on TV ages ago, can't remember the name, SCU? And they'd go through and rule out driver, road, car etc |
--Wolf-- (128) | ||
| 1110584 | 2010-06-16 10:23:00 | Never mind car failure, road conditions etc? what, the car went and got boozed up, and then the road crushed an innocents women's legs,so the driver is a victim. Remove the mindset that its a car, and we all accept car death and destruction as a fact of life, and consider it a hazardous device likely to kill when used irresponsibly.Something that should be used with utmost care and to avoid harm. And how was it used? By a drunk who smashed into a parked car and crushed a women and altered the rest of her life. 10 years in jail sounds about right if it was her first boozed-maiming person driving incident. Part of being a man is facing up to the consequences of your actions, this should apply to young ladies as well. Would you blame others or conditions if you had pulled that stunt? |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1110585 | 2010-06-16 10:52:00 | Um 4th DRIVING OFFENCE - no where did it say 4th drink driving offence, so don't know why you're trying to make her sound like an alcoholic drink driver. Yes it does - immediately below the big advertisement- and it is the fact that she IS a fourth time offender that she should have gone to jail. |
decibel (11645) | ||
| 1110586 | 2010-06-16 11:34:00 | Technically she went to jail - it is just with the high prison musters and the high cost of keeping people there, they allow offenders to serve their sentence in their home under restrictions. All you people who want to have everyone locked up should be able to volunteer for a higher tax rate to pay for the prison sentences you want. I bet when it came to putting your money where your mouth is you'd suddenly not want to cough up. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 1110587 | 2010-06-16 14:27:00 | Um 4th DRIVING OFFENCE - no where did it say 4th drink driving offence, so don't know why you're trying to make her sound like an alcoholic drink driver. If it WAS her 3rd drink driving offence over the age of 21 ( i think ) she would've gone to jail regardless of what/who she hit. "It was her fourth driving offence." RTFA! |
beeswax34 (63) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 | |||||