| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 114641 | 2010-12-11 09:35:00 | Improving the quality of an image | Renmoo (66) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1160688 | 2010-12-11 09:35:00 | Hi all, I have an image of a nasal spray in which quality is slightly blurry and looks rather unattractive. Is there any tool or plug-in for photoshop that can improve the clarity of it? The link to the image is here: sunshinepharmacy.co.nz |
Renmoo (66) | ||
| 1160689 | 2010-12-11 09:46:00 | I went to click the link, and a warning came up, saying the pharmacy site is untrusted? | kahawai chaser (3545) | ||
| 1160690 | 2010-12-11 10:11:00 | Hi Renmoo, Better? Did not spend long on it. PM me if you want a better copy. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1160691 | 2010-12-11 19:09:00 | Looks OK to me. With shopping images like that, it shows you the product, which is all you need, doesn't have to be a work of art, I've bought things from pharmacies online and I just look to see if they have the right one I'm after and how much it is. Couldn't really care how good the pic is. | pctek (84) | ||
| 1160692 | 2010-12-11 19:34:00 | Think you would almost have to have a camera with a macro lens (for taking close up photo's) to get things clearer and if the bottle is round, the front of the label will be in focus while the back will be slightly out ... compensate by using different "F" stops on your camera to change depth of field. Don't think you're going to have much luck with Photshop unfortunately. | SP8's (9836) | ||
| 1160693 | 2010-12-12 08:25:00 | CSI Miami is not real, photos cannot be magically enhanced. Take a new, better photo. |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 1160694 | 2010-12-12 08:28:00 | I went to click the link, and a warning came up, saying the pharmacy site is untrusted? Add a www. to the front of the URL and it'll be fine. |
somebody (208) | ||
| 1160695 | 2010-12-12 18:54:00 | Unfortunately you are never going to get a decent image from that link. The image is only 72dpi 400px X 300px and resampling up never works properly. Obviously the original studio shot would have been taken in a far higher resolution so you would be better trying to obtain that. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear as the saying goes especially from a compressed jpeg image. And as Agent_24 said never believe what you see on TV. You can improve the shot only if it is going to be substantially reduced in size for web use. The image as it is is crap. | fnphoto (2434) | ||
| 1 | |||||