| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 110558 | 2010-06-22 09:09:00 | NZ China trade balance. | martynz (5445) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1112627 | 2010-06-29 10:19:00 | ... Who do I believe transparency Internationale or bk t about who is the most corrupt. You lose. Missed out your above point. If Obama can receive the Nobel Peace Price, well, well, those so-called 'International' bodies can go to xxxx. They are good for a lough. Never in my life I take those seriously. No, no. you don't have to take my words for granted, but use your own observation and judgement. |
bk T (215) | ||
| 1112628 | 2010-07-08 06:17:00 | From today's DomPost....John Key is quoted as saying "New Zealand currently imports about $6b of goods and services from China and exports about $4b. We can correct that imbalance and, in fact, potentially be selling more to China than we're buying from them." Now back to irrelevant debates on capital punishment, defs. of democracy etc. etc. |
martynz (5445) | ||
| 1112629 | 2010-07-08 08:04:00 | From today's DomPost . . . . John Key is quoted as saying "New Zealand currently imports about $6b of goods and services from China and exports about $4b . We can correct that imbalance and, in fact, potentially be selling more to China than we're buying from them . " . No doubt sorted by selling our farms to the Chinese . . |
paulw (1826) | ||
| 1112630 | 2010-07-08 11:53:00 | I hope the commies dont get the Crafar farms. | prefect (6291) | ||
| 1112631 | 2010-07-08 21:35:00 | Only Thais can own land in Thailand,which would have some merit here. | Cicero (40) | ||
| 1112632 | 2010-07-08 21:44:00 | There would be some merit in allowing non citizens to only lease land rather than buy land. | Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1112633 | 2010-07-08 22:03:00 | There would be some merit in allowing non citizens to only lease land rather than buy land. I agree entirely Snorty,but I am afriad the horse has bolted,so a bit late to close the gate. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1112634 | 2010-07-08 23:16:00 | Well given this no foreign ownership mentality, why hasn't anyone put pressure on the receivers to only consider tenders from, and only from, NZ? (even if they are lower) If you were selling a house, would you consider the buyer's origins and accept a lower offer from a person if they were from NZ? (and reject a substantially higher offer from a foreigner) |
utopian201 (6245) | ||
| 1112635 | 2010-07-08 23:34:00 | Well given this no foreign ownership mentality, why hasn't anyone put pressure on the receivers to only consider tenders from, and only from, NZ? (even if they are lower) If you were selling a house, would you consider the buyer's origins and accept a lower offer from a person if they were from NZ? (and reject a substantially higher offer from a foreigner) They could own the farm and pay rental for land. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1112636 | 2010-07-08 23:51:00 | Well given this no foreign ownership mentality, why hasn't anyone put pressure on the receivers to only consider tenders from, and only from, NZ? (even if they are lower) If you were selling a house, would you consider the buyer's origins and accept a lower offer from a person if they were from NZ? (and reject a substantially higher offer from a foreigner) I understand the receivers have a (legal?) responsibility to get the maximum price. I assume the lenders could bring an action against them. |
martynz (5445) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | |||||