| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 114747 | 2010-12-15 20:44:00 | Best CD and DVD blank discs. | Krad (7878) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1161907 | 2010-12-16 23:52:00 | Burn slower[/url] Don't burn slower, but don't burn fastest either. You'd think burning slower would give better results, but depending on the disc, you can actually get -worse- results. I don't know why, but some discs like faster speeds (for example I have verbatim 48x cds which have better quality when burned at 8x compared to 4x and 16x). Best quality is a combination of your burner, its firmware and the disc. If your burner is rubbish, it will affect the quality of your burn. |
utopian201 (6245) | ||
| 1161908 | 2010-12-17 00:04:00 | I use (and have used) Sony, Imation, SKC - never really had an issue with any of them Someone gave me Transonics once - I used 2, threw another out, and gave them back |
Myth (110) | ||
| 1161909 | 2010-12-17 00:34:00 | The Mitsubishi Blue Azo CD-Rs from Dick Smith were great | Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 1161910 | 2010-12-17 01:15:00 | Don't burn slower, but don't burn fastest either. You'd think burning slower would give better results, but depending on the disc, you can actually get -worse- results. I don't know why, but some discs like faster speeds (for example I have verbatim 48x cds which have better quality when burned at 8x compared to 4x and 16x). Best quality is a combination of your burner, its firmware and the disc. If your burner is rubbish, it will affect the quality of your burn. I meant attempt a burn at a slower speed if you are having difficulties recording at whatever speed you are currently attempting. Better still, use decent media. |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||