Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 111736	2010-08-09 15:00:00	Who we are Fighting in Afghanistan	KenESmith (6287)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
1126164	2010-08-14 02:04:00	What do the Terrorist actually want you mean? Why dont you give us your take on it, love to hear it :) So you don't know. Here I was thinking you were typing from a cave somewhere.	Twelvevolts (5457)
1126165	2010-08-14 02:06:00	Obviously the whole deal was thought up by the Sensible Sentencing people would be twelvevolts take on Afghanistan. Actually people who think we should have tough sentencing of the Iranian type should move to the places that have it - but of course they never do.	Twelvevolts (5457)
1126166	2010-08-14 02:37:00	There is nothing wrong with being anti american, they are the most arrogant ******* country in the world. I do hope they find the weapons of mass destruction they are looking for, the reason they invaded Iraq. Fighting Al Quada and the Taleban is a lost cause other than than the satisfaction of bowling them over. In their mind they are not terrorists but freedom fighters trying to get foreign forces out of their country. If NZ was Afghanistan or Iraq I would be trying to kill as many foreign occupiers as I could. Bombing preferably because in a fire fight I would come second with my trusty 303. "There is nothing wrong with being anti american, they are the most arrogant ******* country in the world." wrong. The INDIAN position on global warming and their right to have per captia pollution equall to america makes them 1000% more arrogant as a nation than america any and every day. Much of the alleged arrogance of americans is in fact ignorance, not to be confused with arrogance. FACT. Sadam had wmd, he used them, but not against the coalition, in either conflict, because he was scared of getting his arse nuked. The last of them went to syria, along with at least 1 fighter wing.	angry (15305)
1126167	2010-08-14 02:45:00	There is a difference between tough sentencing and barbaric sentencing. The trouble is too many in NZ thing a slap across the wrist with a damp bus ticket is reasonable sentencing. There needs to be an element of justice in the sentencing handed down, both restorative and punitive. The sentence should have a sufficient punative element to effectively discourage re-offending.	KenESmith (6287)
1126168	2010-08-14 02:53:00	Just about all wars have been caused by religion and the Afghan one is religion but the Iraqi war is partly oil. THE AMERICANS WANT THE OIL THE AMERICANS WANT THE OIL THE AMERICANS WANT THE OIL (continued for far to long) get a new record. Neither "UN Sanctioned" iraqi conflict has been about oil. if the us wanted the oil, they would have gone to full occupation, alone, and taken it. They have yet to do this, because IT WAS, AND IS NOT, AN OIL WAR. The last iraqui conflict was more about GW's ego, than oil. The conflict in Afghanistan is not about religion (A war against Islam persay) It is a conflict against Militant fudamentalists, stone age (Thinking), Taliban and al queda elements. If they would stay in afghanistan, and just fight each other, I would say leave, "TODAY". But as 911 proved, they want armageddon so we must stay, for as long as it takes, whatever the cost. This is not, and never has been a resource conflict. It is about preventing a bunch of religeous maniacs enforcing their lifstyle choice on the whole planet.	angry (15305)
1126169	2010-08-14 02:56:00	Sickly liberals will be the downfall of our Western civilization, they need to found and dropped off in Taliban areas with a big crusader like cross tattooed on their face. aye	angry (15305)
1126170	2010-08-14 03:05:00	One could store sufficient biological agents to depopulate a large proportion of Europe in a single shipping container, and how easy would that be to hide in a desert simply by burying it during a sand storm, so that the activity wouldn't be observable from a satellite.	KenESmith (6287)
1126171	2010-08-14 03:18:00	No seriously Mike, what do Al-Qaeda actually want? I really do want to hear your thoughts, maybe I am wrong! They wouldn't truly know themselves so why ask me. It is just like the crap in Ireland over recent years, mainly religion.	mikebartnz (21)
1126172	2010-08-14 03:18:00	So you don't know. Here I was thinking you were typing from a cave somewhere. US backed Saddam Hussein in the early 80's (well known fact but for those that disbelieve) www.gwu.edu The relationship went pear shaped and it was necessary to remove him. Saddam, Iran, Syria groups in Pakistan, and others back Al-Qaeda to fight Western interests. Religion is used to motivate both sides, but it basically boils down to $$(oil) once you blow away the smoke screen. You could write 1000's of pages on this conflict, but no one will ever read it, best you can do is try and make people think for themselves. Read this a while back fairly amusing quick read. humanrights.change.org	Battleneter2 (9361)
1126173	2010-08-14 03:56:00	US backed Saddam Hussein in the early 80's (well known fact but for those that disbelieve) www.gwu.edu The relationship went pear shaped and it was necessary to remove him. Saddam, Iran, Syria groups in Pakistan, and others back Al-Qaeda to fight Western interests. Religion is used to motivate both sides, but it basically boils down to $$(oil) once you blow away the smoke screen. You could write 1000's of pages on this conflict, but no one will ever read it, best you can do is try and make people think for themselves. Read this a while back fairly amusing quick read. humanrights.change.org we know the us ONCE backed sadam and iran AT THE SAME TIME. (I wonder if you understand the rationale of that). This conflict is NOT about resources. you claim to know soo much, but you keep banging the same resources myth drum. In this conflict, resources are weapons, not the reason for the conflict. That is one reason why Iran keeps funding the conflict, and wants it in helmand. Do you know why they want to keep it there?????????	angry (15305)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11