Forum Home
PC World Chat
Thread ID: 111844	2010-08-14 02:42:00	Filling The Prisons	Twelvevolts (5457)	PC World Chat

Post ID	Timestamp	Content	User
1127533	2010-08-14 21:41:00	Metla, People go to prison in this country for self defence if the extortionist police dont like them. The chap who was defending himself from tagger,is a case in point!	Cicero (40)
1127534	2010-08-14 21:54:00	Really? Where's the evidence? The arab Sultans didn't have a problem with crazed eununchs running amok in their harems committing violence on people because of drustration. besides if you have one form of physical punishment, you'll have others - so they're castrated first, then if they commit acts of barbarity then they get some other punishment. The majority of eunuchs in harems were infact slaves from birth, or volenteers. as opposed to punished criminalls, so inherently much more compliant from the start. In the 12th century, which saw much violent and agressive muslim expansion. casteration and complete emasculation was used on slaves, and captives as a metheod of controll. the intent being to make them more compliant. it was found however to frequently have the opposite effect. particularly when slaves escaped, their acts of barbarity and mahem were found to be horrific, also they normally had to be killed when finally cornered, as they would refuse to be captured a second. This practice was discontinued from the early 13th for the above reasons. most criminals casterated or suffering amputation, die slowly from resulting infections and lack of medical care. which is part of the intent in this vengance style punishment. :)	angry (15305)
1127535	2010-08-14 22:01:00	The chap who was defending himself from tagger,is a case in point! he was defending his property from a repeat raceialy targeted attack, as opposed to his person. he slightly over reacted. But he should have recieved a suspende sentence IMHO. :)	angry (15305)
1127536	2010-08-14 22:17:00	he was defending his property from a repeat raceialy targeted attack, as opposed to his person. he slightly over reacted. But he should have recieved a suspende sentence IMHO. :) Do we choose how we over-react?	Cicero (40)
1127537	2010-08-14 22:32:00	Do we choose how we over-react? You could write severall books on that one . I dont belive we allways do . If it had of been a PROVEN PREMEDETATED ACT it would have been reflected in sentencing (One would expect) . I dont belive it was . Is a spontaneous reaction, caused by pentup rage and frustration, from a recipient/victim of repeat racial victimisation, and racially targeted crime, a choice, or a reaction???	angry (15305)
1127538	2010-08-14 22:58:00	Metla, People go to prison in this country for self defence if the extortionist police dont like them. Everyone I know who has ever been to prison deserved to be there, and its a damn shame a couple of them were ever let out, they maybe intelligent enough to stay under the police radar but they are dangerous people every minute of every hour of every day for the rest of their lives, and they live amongst us. No system is perfect, Some get picked up when they shouldn't,some (many) avoid jail when thats the only place they should be.	Metla (12)
1127539	2010-08-14 23:00:00	But he should have recieved a suspende sentence IMHO. :) For chasing down and stabbing someone half his size to death? He should have been boiled alive, children do not deserve to be murdered by adults, there is no defense or justification.	Metla (12)
1127540	2010-08-14 23:44:00	Is a spontaneous reaction, caused by pentup rage and frustration, from a recipient/victim of repeat racial victimisation, and racially targeted crime, a choice, or a reaction??? Some seem to think that sorting young crap out was that mans hobby,it was not,he was taken to the edge.	Cicero (40)
1127541	2010-08-15 01:05:00	As you say talk is cheap so what is your solution?:groan: How about some thinking outside the box of foaming at the mouth savagery....like this www.guardian.co.uk And if they can't read teach them.	martynz (5445)
1127542	2010-08-15 01:17:00	How about some thinking outside the box of foaming at the mouth savagery....like this www.guardian.co.uk And if they can't read teach them. Nah wont work, splitting rocks like crims did at Robin Island much better. Tried new age **** before didnt work,will never work. I am happy with the gazetted punishments for crime in NZ but judges give out sentences less than the maximum. Foaming at the mouth is a normal response to crime it must work because mainstream politicians in NZ around election time espouse harsher sentences. Its a vote winner. We have some nice harsh laws on the books now, just got to apply them.	prefect (6291)
1 2 3 4 5 6