| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 111886 | 2010-08-15 21:57:00 | Some welfare stats. | Cicero (40) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1128122 | 2010-08-16 02:00:00 | Its the ball is in your court, not corner. | prefect (6291) | ||
| 1128123 | 2010-08-16 02:20:00 | You made it, pay what the system says, or use your head and reduce the ammount you are paying. The balls in your corner. You cant get it reduced, apparently i earn too much, but that was besides the point, they are working off he said/she said type of thing which is quite disturbing. |
rob_on_guitar (4196) | ||
| 1128124 | 2010-08-16 02:59:00 | You cant get it reduced, apparently i earn too much, but that was besides the point, they are working off he said/she said type of thing which is quite disturbing. change the way you get paid. If you'r a white male on paye, with out control of how much paye you pay, they are going to slaughter you. take control of how much paye you pay, they will be difficult about it but in the end your payments and paye must align. at the end of every tax year, claim a rebate for over/extra child support payment. you are entitled to do this, but they will make it difficult. a lot of people are paying a little more in FBT, but MUCH less in child support. They can be extremly difficult to deal with because of the: ethnicity, gender, and personal agendas, of so many of their staff. |
angry (15305) | ||
| 1128125 | 2010-08-16 04:39:00 | National has to do it, coz labour will only spend more of what we don't have on the folks who do nothing. Interesting comment by Paul Holmes in last Sunday's Herald: If it had not been for the useless, drunken, ill-tempered and stupid economic thug, Robert Muldoon, we might have had a scheme that would have made us one of the smartest outfits in the world. Muldoon was the worst creature, the troll from the filthy swamps, who ever got control of this country. This week, a friend gave me a copy of a brilliant piece written by Brian Gaynor and published in the New Zealand Herald almost exactly three years ago. Gaynor regards Muldoon's abandonment of Labour's far-sighted and ahead-of-its-time superannuation scheme, set up in 1974, as the worst decision taken by any New Zealand government in the past 40 years. Muldoon campaigned on abolishing the scheme in the 1975 election. He said it would turn us into a Soviet clone. Hence the Cossacks on television. The Yacht Squadrons reeled in horror. It worked a treat. Rowling was gone and, true to his word, Muldoon abolished the scheme some weeks later. But what stupidity. Gaynor works out that if we had stuck with the scheme, New Zealand would now be "an Antipodean Tiger". The superannuation scheme would conservatively be worth $240 billion. In other words, we would have savings enough to swim in. We would be flooded with money. I'm a National voter, and I fully agree with Holmes' comments. Labour did have it right, but we threw it away. :annoyed: :mad: |
WalOne (4202) | ||
| 1128126 | 2010-08-16 05:35:00 | Interesting comment by Paul Holmes in last Sunday's Herald: If it had not been for the useless, drunken, ill-tempered and stupid economic thug, Robert Muldoon, we might have had a scheme that would have made us one of the smartest outfits in the world. Muldoon was the worst creature, the troll from the filthy swamps, who ever got control of this country. This week, a friend gave me a copy of a brilliant piece written by Brian Gaynor and published in the New Zealand Herald almost exactly three years ago. Gaynor regards Muldoon's abandonment of Labour's far-sighted and ahead-of-its-time superannuation scheme, set up in 1974, as the worst decision taken by any New Zealand government in the past 40 years. Muldoon campaigned on abolishing the scheme in the 1975 election. He said it would turn us into a Soviet clone. Hence the Cossacks on television. The Yacht Squadrons reeled in horror. It worked a treat. Rowling was gone and, true to his word, Muldoon abolished the scheme some weeks later. But what stupidity. Gaynor works out that if we had stuck with the scheme, New Zealand would now be "an Antipodean Tiger". The superannuation scheme would conservatively be worth $240 billion. In other words, we would have savings enough to swim in. We would be flooded with money. I'm a National voter, and I fully agree with Holmes' comments. Labour did have it right, but we threw it away. :annoyed: :mad: I was sent that Gaynor article from a pal in OZ,some time ago. It beggars belief how our masters can be so ignorant at our expense. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1128127 | 2010-08-16 05:49:00 | change the way you get paid. If you'r a white male on paye, with out control of how much paye you pay, they are going to slaughter you. take control of how much paye you pay, they will be difficult about it but in the end your payments and paye must align. at the end of every tax year, claim a rebate for over/extra child support payment. you are entitled to do this, but they will make it difficult. a lot of people are paying a little more in FBT, but MUCH less in child support. They can be extremly difficult to deal with because of the: ethnicity, gender, and personal agendas, of so many of their staff. What??? You suggest Rob pay more tax to reduce the amount of child support he is paying. That is rediculous. You said it right, men on paye are held by the short and curlies |
Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 1128128 | 2010-08-16 07:08:00 | What??? You suggest Rob pay more tax to reduce the amount of child support he is paying. That is rediculous. You said it right, men on paye are held by the short and curlies no I am not saying he pay more tax in TOTAL. I am saying he pay, less paye, less child support, and a little fbt. ie paye 300 child sup 300 = instead. paye 225 child 225 fbt 70 = these are square numbers but you can see what i am saying. total gross income stays same, gross tax around same, disposable income goes up, lifestyle inproves, then instead of increasing salary in the future, just increase fb |
angry (15305) | ||
| 1128129 | 2010-08-16 07:15:00 | I see that compulsory retirement saving is on the agenda again. We had that once but Muldoon took it away after I had been putting in for some 15 years. I never did get a refund for some reason. I have never voted National since then and I'm not ever planning on doing it again either. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1128130 | 2010-08-16 07:33:00 | I see that compulsory retirement saving is on the agenda again. We had that once but Muldoon took it away after I had been putting in for some 15 years. I never did get a refund for some reason. I have never voted National since then and I'm not ever planning on doing it again either. aye, same here, i will never vote for hairyleggs's queer mates so im left with green and winnie, so i genrally dont bother. |
angry (15305) | ||
| 1128131 | 2010-08-16 07:46:00 | Those that don't bother get anything they deserve and have no right to complain in my opinion. | Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | |||||