| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 111886 | 2010-08-15 21:57:00 | Some welfare stats. | Cicero (40) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1128212 | 2010-08-21 09:24:00 | You have blown any credibility for your argument with saying that. no I havent. all drinking drivers should be made to go to multiple fatals and clean up the mess their drunken compatriots have made. And have to listen to the blithereing drunken murderers bleating that is was the kids, or the other blokes fault, not theirs, "I didnt do anything wrong its their fault" all with the appropriate drunken slurs. DRINK DRIVE KILL. (Yourself or somebody else) DRINK DRIVE DIE. same as the anti speeding slogan. IF YOUR PERPARED TO SPEED, YOUR PREPARED TO KILL. which can also read. IF YOUR PREPARED TO DRINK AND DRIVE, YOUR PREPARED TO KILL. But it dosent ring right on a billboard. anybody who drinks and drives only has to look in the mirror to see a potential murderer. If you cant see that, I am sorry for you. |
angry (15305) | ||
| 1128213 | 2010-08-21 09:51:00 | Well actually I agree if you drink and drive you might as well be called a murderer as at some point it could happen | gary67 (56) | ||
| 1128214 | 2010-08-21 10:04:00 | Well actually I agree if you drink and drive you might as well be called a murderer as at some point it could happen If you use alcohol and then drive and then kill a person you would be an idiot. I would suggest a charge of manslaughter rather than murder though. Reasoning here. Murder involves intent to kill which may be difficult to prove by the crown. Manslaughter on the other hand does not need proof of intent to support the charge. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1128215 | 2010-08-21 10:21:00 | If you use alcohol and then drive and then kill a person you would be an idiot. I would suggest a charge of manslaughter rather than murder though. Reasoning here. Murder involves intent to kill which may be difficult to prove by the crown. Manslaughter on the other hand does not need proof of intent to support the charge. yes, it runs like the armed robber argument, that when he walked into the bank with a gun he did not intend to kill that person. case law in particular dean whitcliff, murder conviction reduced by the court of appeal. dangerous/drunken driving causing death is the common local charge. although manslaughter is becoming more prevelant in dd killings, as it should be, because the sentencing threshold is higher. common terminology is murderer as opposed to manslaughterer though, for obvious reasons. |
angry (15305) | ||
| 1128216 | 2010-08-23 04:35:00 | and yes I do drink, ocasionally, dont like being drunk or even half drunk dont like the loss of controll (accuracy, balance) or in many cases the smell. Being totally detoxed for severall years may have something to do with it, along with drinking 15 liters of water a day and only needing to pee once before you go to bed because thats how much you sweat in those places. LMAO! - where do these dick-heads come from? |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 1128217 | 2010-08-23 07:25:00 | LMAO! - where do these dick-heads come from? I know my mate, he’s been over here for a few years. Its quiet a difficult program he’s in. The number of posts he’s made recently tell me he’s procrastinating. I told him stop wasting time on that stupid forum get focused and on with your work or come back here to headland where you belong. To answer your question. Go look at your father if you know who he is. |
peter2 (2048) | ||
| 1128218 | 2010-08-23 07:40:00 | So angry's real name is Peter. | qazwsxokmijn (102) | ||
| 1128219 | 2010-08-23 08:56:00 | Or is Peter really angry? | KarameaDave (15222) | ||
| 1128220 | 2010-08-23 09:12:00 | I thought each was a Richard. | R2x1 (4628) | ||
| 1128221 | 2010-08-23 09:31:00 | I thought each was a Richard. That sir is verging on duel territory. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | |||||