| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 112146 | 2010-08-25 23:32:00 | Branding response. | Jams (1051) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1131655 | 2010-08-25 23:32:00 | Hey guys. Been many-a month since I have grazed in this patch but it is one of the few places left amongst my regular boards that appear to be void of pre-adolescent keyboard warriors. I have spent the last year trying to brand my own company (graphic design). Going through ideas upon ideas have finally brought me closer to the light at the end of the tunnel. I have a couple of finished concepts I would like you to look at and simply vote which one you like best. You're welcome to provide feedback but I am at a stage were feedback won't be necessary as I am just applying the finishing touches before I take the logo/brand into colour concepts. Logos. (i34.tinypic.com) My studio/firm is called James Lamb Design. (JLD). Cheers! |
Jams (1051) | ||
| 1131656 | 2010-08-26 00:12:00 | Thanks for voting. Keep them coming! |
Jams (1051) | ||
| 1131657 | 2010-08-26 01:32:00 | Do hope that there is a bit of colour. Looks bland otherwise. Number one is by far the best. The other two seem somewhat confusing. |
Roscoe (6288) | ||
| 1131658 | 2010-08-26 02:31:00 | As I said in the OP, I'm just finalising the finishing touches before I take it into colour concepts. Thanks heaps for voting. |
Jams (1051) | ||
| 1131659 | 2010-08-26 04:25:00 | 2 and 3 don't make sense for JLD. | pctek (84) | ||
| 1131660 | 2010-08-26 04:36:00 | Since it's for a design firm, I guess you need to stand out, but at the risk of having a bad lolg? Tough call. The first one is easiest to read, but I like three too. Depends on how you use it I guess. My vote is for three. |
ubergeek85 (131) | ||
| 1131661 | 2010-08-26 06:38:00 | 2 and 3 make no sense to me, I would avoid them both. 1 seems reasonable. Doesn't stand out to me as a great logo, but isn't bad either. | george12 (7) | ||
| 1131662 | 2010-08-26 06:41:00 | None of them. The letters are not distinct enough to make out the J and L. What I see when looking at the logos: 1. ilD (although 1. is the least confusing) 2. liD 3. ??D My logic is if j has a curled tail, then the next letter also with a curled tail does not make sense. So, if I instead read the first curled tail letter as an i, then the next letter makes sense as an l (following the same design logic). Hope that makes sense. :) |
Jen (38) | ||
| 1131663 | 2010-08-26 07:07:00 | I voted for 1 for pretty much the same reasons already posted | SoniKalien (792) | ||
| 1131664 | 2010-08-26 07:18:00 | As a LOGO designer,have you thought of taking up skiing? | Cicero (40) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||