Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 112644 2010-09-15 20:56:00 Internet Explorer 9 9.0.7930.16406 Beta zqwerty (97) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1137518 2010-09-16 02:01:00 On a system with 512MB RAM, sure, but when was the last time you saw one of those? ;)
Looking at one right now.
mikebartnz (21)
1137519 2010-09-16 02:35:00 Looking at one right now.

Time to get a new PC then :p
pcuser42 (130)
1137520 2010-09-16 02:35:00 Why waste perfectly good hardware? Chilling_Silence (9)
1137521 2010-09-16 02:47:00 Trying IE9 on a workshop PC -- PF1 loads a LOT faster on this, even leaves Firefox and Chrome for dead, adverts and all. wainuitech (129)
1137522 2010-09-16 03:08:00 Time to get a new PC then :p
Why as it does what I want it to do but I am not running Windows otherwise it would be running like a dog.
mikebartnz (21)
1137523 2010-09-16 03:31:00 I am trying the 64 Bit beta along with the 64 bit flash player. Is it just by coincidence the flash player preview was produced by Adobe on the same date as IE9 Beta? Snorkbox (15764)
1137524 2010-09-16 03:33:00 Maybe since it says the 64 bit version of flash takes advantage of the features in IE9 beta. Speedy Gonzales (78)
1137525 2010-09-16 03:39:00 Trying IE9 on a workshop PC -- PF1 loads a LOT faster on this, even leaves Firefox and Chrome for dead, adverts and all.

Any chance of a bit of a comparison, IE9 vs Chrome Canary? Please? :D

I've gone back to XP personally, so can't myself :( At least Chrome Canary works on XP ... ;) Will go back to 7 in a few weeks though methinks.

I figure, bleeding-edge browser vs bleeding-edge browser = Good comparison!
Chilling_Silence (9)
1137526 2010-09-16 03:51:00 IE has ALOT of ground to make back in my opinion. Yes they have the market share, but their current browser is streaks behind the competitors.

:pf1mobmini:
xyz823 (13649)
1137527 2010-09-17 07:31:00 WHY doesn't it run on XP? Not a Querulous Question! Other than MS not wanting it to? PJ Poppa John (284)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9