| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 112641 | 2010-09-15 09:31:00 | Act's David Garrick | mikebartnz (21) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1137462 | 2010-09-19 11:28:00 | And your suggestion about how the SST (and Hide for that matter) should have handled this is????? Were they supposed to have gone public and risked contempt of Court proceedings? I support you if you are arguing that SST, Garrett, Hide, and Act, are guilty of rank hypocrisy, but they couldn't fess up the way you are suggesting. It would have been better if Garrett had never been selected on the Act list in the first place, or never been made the Act spokesman on bringing back the stocks or whatever it is that shower stands for. Or better yet, if he had never committed the offence in the first place. Or, wait, better if he hadn't been born, though I suppose someone must love him, hard though it must be to credit that. I wasn't suggesting they breach the Court order, however they promoted him within their organisation whilst knowing his background. Hypocrisy yes. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | |||||