| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 116011 | 2011-02-13 20:38:00 | Is John Key Gay???? | Trev (427) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1177867 | 2011-02-14 12:40:00 | I guess you might want to tell Alexander the Great and his Persians who conquered most of the known world. This massive and history making society used woman for procreating and men for pleasure. They would not have even considered using a woman for pleasure, it just wasn't done. This is by no means the entire country or even the whole army but was a lot of them, probably the same ratio as today but the axis reversed. May I ask how two people having intercourse and of the same sex can create a child? Making relationships of various kinds legal does not make it right. At one stage it was not legal to be homosexual in NZ but at the same time you could be lesbian and not charged with an offence. You state that men did not use women for pleasure in the army so can I assume you think that the conquerors did not commit rape on women but rather took the men for that purpose? I can, and do discriminate and personally I do not really care that you think I should not. I would assume that you also discriminate as in the next time you go shopping you will leave some brands on the shelf for reasons like it's not made in NZ or contains MSG or not organic etc. Why, also, may I ask did you feel it necessary to use asterisks in your post? |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1177868 | 2011-02-14 19:02:00 | Burn the Gays, burn the Christians, burn the Atheists, burn the blacks, burn the Gypsies, burn tall people, burn short people, burn the Chinese. Jesus wept. |
wmoore (6009) | ||
| 1177869 | 2011-02-14 19:29:00 | I guess you might want to tell Alexander the Great and his Persians who conquered most of the known world. This massive and history making society used woman for procreating and men for pleasure. They would not have even considered using a woman for pleasure, it just wasn't done. This is by no means the entire country or even the whole army but was a lot of them, probably the same ratio as today but the axis reversed. I don't see what being gay has to do with conquering the old known world. Having said that, he and his elk didn't last long. 20yrs if that. Civil unrest tore the place down after his death! |
SolMiester (139) | ||
| 1177870 | 2011-02-14 19:29:00 | May I ask how two people having intercourse and of the same sex can create a child? Reread the post Making relationships of various kinds legal does not make it right. At one stage it was not legal to be homosexual in NZ but at the same time you could be lesbian and not charged with an offence. You state that men did not use women for pleasure in the army so can I assume you think that the conquerors did not commit rape on women but rather took the men for that purpose? Rape is not pleasure, its power, completely different I can, and do discriminate and personally I do not really care that you think I should not. Then I feel sorry for your narrow-mindedness I would assume that you also discriminate as in the next time you go shopping you will leave some brands on the shelf for reasons like it's not made in NZ or contains MSG or not organic etc. Its hardly the same, the box of cereal does not care, the guy that is beaten to a pulp for liking other guys does Why, also, may I ask did you feel it necessary to use asterisks in your post? Its the smut filter I assume, I used bad words. |
DeSade (984) | ||
| 1177871 | 2011-02-14 20:20:00 | I feel sorry for people that do not use words like homosexual or lesbian and would rather use the word gay for what they do. I also feel sorry for those who read books by P.G.Wodehouse where it may say that XYZ went to Brighton and had a gay time for example. Such readers would possibly be left with a mistaken impression as to what was actually happening. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1177872 | 2011-02-14 22:02:00 | Lets just agree to disagree, I am tired of beating my head against this particular brick wall and its going to take more than my words to change this opinion. | DeSade (984) | ||
| 1177873 | 2011-02-14 22:18:00 | Lets just agree to disagree, I am tired of beating my head against this particular brick wall and its going to take more than my words to change this opinion. OK then. Perhaps you could beat your your head against a different brick wall if it makes you feel better. Possibly it may help you to know why I have the attitude I do have though. At age 14-15 I was approached by a homosexual for sex. I told him I thought I liked girls and he told me that male sex was not as naughty as I had been told. I left the job I was doing for that reason. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1177874 | 2011-02-14 22:31:00 | I know of three people who are gay, so I kind of have to accept the gay community :waughh: (Surprisingly no lesbians :stare:) From your logic, if you know 3 people are murderers, we then have to accept the murderers 'community'? |
bk T (215) | ||
| 1177875 | 2011-02-14 22:34:00 | Would you have reacted the same way if it was a woman, its still illegal at that age, not that legality stops anyone. He asked, you said no, I don't see a problem unless it escalated to stalking but you do not say so here so I don't know. |
DeSade (984) | ||
| 1177876 | 2011-02-14 22:47:00 | Would you have reacted the same way if it was a woman, its still illegal at that age, not that legality stops anyone. He asked, you said no, I don't see a problem unless it escalated to stalking but you do not say so here so I don't know. I may have reacted the same way or not if a woman approached me. I did not know what sex was at that time anyway. Having said that I guess I was curious and may have been more receptive to advances. Don't think he stalked, as in following me, but was getting persistent and I had to say no several times. Hence I left the job. In those days it was easy to get another job. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |||||