| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 116031 | 2011-02-14 05:36:00 | Name the judge and sack him | Digby (677) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1178192 | 2011-02-15 04:04:00 | 12 Volts. home.nzcity.co.nz And this is the justice system you defend? There is no Justice!!! |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1178193 | 2011-02-15 05:15:00 | Twelve Volts As I have said twice before. The Judge let him out on bail. When he had a long history of violence and the police opposed it. (yes we all know the parole board "had" to let him out.) But the judge did not have to grant bail. I just don't know why everyone is missing that.:groan: |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1178194 | 2011-02-15 05:48:00 | Also we have to pay to keep people locked up forever. We cannot afford that. Quite right , we should parole them and let them murder us. It is hard not to rude when we have people who ignore the fact, it doesn't matter who is at fault, the fact is the system is obviously not working and if you think that is OK, we don't. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1178195 | 2011-02-15 05:54:00 | I just don't know why everyone is missing that.:groan: everyone? Surely you just mean 12v? Whenever i see his dribble I just picture blanket man, and the motivation to enter into conversation with him dissipates instantly. |
Metla (12) | ||
| 1178196 | 2011-02-15 05:56:00 | Agreed it is silly you, learn the law and then you won't need to ask. You mean your're not going to explain? :lol: Wouldn't be because you can't would it? :lol: So come on, show us all your infinite understanding of the law. :D |
B.M. (505) | ||
| 1178197 | 2011-02-15 06:21:00 | Quite right , we should parole them and let them murder us. It is hard not to rude when we have people who ignore the fact, it doesn't matter who is at fault, the fact is the system is obviously not working and if you think that is OK, we don't. I am all for the death penalty it is cheap and although the liberals say it is not a deterrent it sure as hell cures any recidivist behaviour. More seriously when there is no doubt of guilt there is little point in trying to reform the unbalanced, repeat offending, animals amongst us at considerable expense when there in not the slightest possibility that they can become safe to live with normal people. |
CliveM (6007) | ||
| 1178198 | 2011-02-15 06:56:00 | I am all for the death penalty it is cheap and although the liberals say it is not a deterrent it sure as hell cures any recidivist behaviour. More seriously when there is no doubt of guilt there is little point in trying to reform the unbalanced, repeat offending, animals amongst us at considerable expense when there in not the slightest possibility that they can become safe to live with normal people. Sorry Clive, I nearly put you in the same category as 12v. My humble apology. |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1178199 | 2011-02-15 07:44:00 | I doubt several people contributing to this thread could name the three branches of Governemnt in New Zealand, they certainly show no understanding of how our system of Government works. We see criticism of "the system"" from people who haven't even bothered to find out what it is they are criticising. So I was commenting on the Parole Board and the original sentence, the Sunday News effectively mixed the whole lot up and got it wrong. And yes I do know why the Parole Board sees people who are to be released at the end of their sentence, unlike many here I have actually sat in on a Parole Board hearing. The point was from the beginning that the Parole Board and the Judicary don't make the law, and have less discretion under the law than many here presume. |
Twelvevolts (5457) | ||
| 1178200 | 2011-02-15 07:55:00 | I doubt several people contributing to this thread could name the three branches of Governemnt in New Zealand, they certainly show no understanding of how our system of Government works. We see criticism of "the system"" from people who haven't even bothered to find out what it is they are criticising. So I was commenting on the Parole Board and the original sentence, the Sunday News effectively mixed the whole lot up and got it wrong. And yes I do know why the Parole Board sees people who are to be released at the end of their sentence, unlike many here I have actually sat in on a Parole Board hearing. The point was from the beginning that the Parole Board and the Judicary don't make the law, and have less discretion under the law than many here presume. You are still ignoring the fact that a judge let him out on bail and are instead riding your big high horse. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1178201 | 2011-02-15 08:04:00 | And yes I do know why the Parole Board sees people who are to be released at the end of their sentence, unlike many here I have actually sat in on a Parole Board hearing. The point was from the beginning that the Parole Board and the Judicary don't make the law, and have less discretion under the law than many here presume. What exactly do you mean by that? All we see from is you generalities, from someone who has been a prosecutor we would expect some insight rather than "I know this, you don't GTFO-****". What do you mean by discretion? I can look at that statement and assume that what you are implying is that the parole board HAS to release anyone and everyone up for parole. Care to explain further rather than calling everyone an idiot? You do realise that you are only antagonising yourself here? I suggest you stop with the elitist attitude explain things when they are asked rather than just attacking everyone who does not agree with you. |
Cato (6936) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 | |||||