| Forum Home | ||||
| Press F1 | ||||
| Thread ID: 118784 | 2011-06-21 00:57:00 | monitor resolution question | clwsham (16313) | Press F1 |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1210874 | 2011-06-21 00:57:00 | hi, i was wondering if 1680x1050 is proportional to 1080p resolution... what i mean is, can you run 1680x1050 on a HD monitor and not get stretched images? please ask for more info if needed coz i dont think i worded this properly :D |
clwsham (16313) | ||
| 1210875 | 2011-06-21 01:20:00 | According to my calculator - it has been wrong before. :D HD: 1920 x 1080 = 1.77777777777 = 16:9 Ratio 1680 x 1050 = 1.6 = 16:10 Ratio There will be some squishing (very technical jargon) at fullscreen stretching (another one). :) |
Scubadoo (16151) | ||
| 1210876 | 2011-06-21 01:23:00 | :thanks :thanks might as well get a 1680x1050 monitor... be cheaper anyway AND would keep frame rates up as well |
clwsham (16313) | ||
| 1210877 | 2011-06-21 01:28:00 | the next 16:9 resolution down is 1600x900... do'h so obvious- a multiple of ten! | clwsham (16313) | ||
| 1210878 | 2011-06-21 01:35:00 | A lot of 22" monitors run at 1920x1080. | Cellux (15145) | ||
| 1210879 | 2011-06-21 04:21:00 | A lot of 22" monitors run at 1920x1080. Most new 22's now seem to be 1080. These are now cheaper than the 1680x1050 as well . |
1101 (13337) | ||
| 1 | |||||