| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 116214 | 2011-02-21 22:28:00 | I need someone with a server to test something for me | Morgenmuffel (187) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1180359 | 2011-02-21 22:28:00 | Okey doke i am going nuts with a problem i can't seem to fix The issue is a Flash slideshow (don't want to know about js) fine with this. Here is the link to download it www.maani.us This is version 2.7 which fixes a bug in 2.64, I have downloaded this file and uploaded it to a site, but everytime i use it the bug is there, and when i check the version it says 2.64 not 2.7. To check the version, once you have the slide show running 1. Move the mouse to the upper-left corner of the slideshow. The mouse must be within 5 pixels from the top-left corner. 2. Click the slideshow to make the flash file receive key events. 3. Press the 'L' key. A text will appear showing the actual slideshow's version. Please tell me what version number appears for you. as i have done the following and still get v2.64 Deleted it off the server manually and put the new version up, Installed it into a seperate directory on the server. Installed it on a completely different server renamed the slideshow flashfile Cleared my flash cache, cleared my browser cache, rebooted the router, rebooted the computer, rebooted the cat. everything i can think of, and i cannot get version 2.7 to appear I just want someone else to check it and confirm that it is not 2.7 in the zip file or confirm that i am doing something wrong Do not go to this site below till you have tested the above, as i want to eliminate any form of cacheing Basically if you look at this scrapbookoutletnz.co.nz You will see the fourth slide doesn't work correctly, but the sixth slide does the difference between the two is that the sixth slide doesn't have text. This bug was fixed in version 2.7 of the slideshow |
Morgenmuffel (187) | ||
| 1180360 | 2011-02-22 02:44:00 | And don't worry about it V2.64 is the latest version, apparently there was just an error in version numbers. And the bug is a different one (although similar), to the one that was quashed |
Morgenmuffel (187) | ||
| 1 | |||||