Forum Home
Press F1
 
Thread ID: 119075 2011-07-03 22:38:00 Which is best for a thumb/pen drive - NTFS or FAT 32? tuiruru (12277) Press F1
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1214459 2011-07-03 22:38:00 ......and the reasons for that are?

:thanks
tuiruru (12277)
1214460 2011-07-03 22:42:00 Depends what youre going to do with it. NTFS will work, but on some systems if you want to make it a bootable USB flash drive, (some / or probably all) dont support booting from an NTFS formatted USB flash drive.

But you have to make sure you plug it into a USB port / system that supports NTFS. Not all (windows) O/s support NTFS

The only thing with FAT32 is, if the file youre copying to it, is over 4 GB (if the USB flash drive is 8 -16 GB), you cant. Since, FAT32 has a 4 GB file limit
Speedy Gonzales (78)
1214461 2011-07-03 22:47:00 NTFS is a better system in general but it depends on usage. They often come preformatted FAT 32 because it's more universally compatible but I think it still has a maximum file size restriction that can be an issue if you transfer very large files.

I'd use FAT32 on small drives < 2G and NTFS on anything larger myself.
Reasons:
FAT 32 is a little faster and works on more OS's
NTFS is more efficient (wastes less space on large drives) and fault tolerant. Also allows larger file sizes (I think)

Edit: speedy confirmed my file size comments while I was typing :)
dugimodo (138)
1214462 2011-07-03 22:47:00 Depends what youre going to do with it. NTFS will work, but on some systems if you want to make it a bootable USB flash drive, it wont boot from an NTFS formatted USB flash drive. \

But you have to make sure you plug it into a USB port / system that supports NTFS. Not all (windows) O/s's support NTFS

The only thing with FAT32 is, if the file youre copying to it, is over 4 GB (if the USB flash drive is 8 -16 GB), you cant. Since, FAT32 has a 4 GB file limit

Yeah - it's for a bootable USB, and I kew there was a File size limit kicking around somewhere.

Thanks Speedy!! :thumbs:
tuiruru (12277)
1214463 2011-07-03 22:48:00 NTFS is a better system in general but it depends on usage. They often come preformatted FAT 32 because it's more universally compatible but I think it still has a maximum file size restriction that can be an issue if you transfer very large files.

I'd use FAT32 on small drives < 2G and NTFS on anything larger myself.
Reasons:
FAT 32 is a little faster and works on more OS's
NTFS is more efficient (wastes less space on large drives) and fault tolerant. Also allows larger file sizes (I think)

Thanks Dugi!
tuiruru (12277)
1214464 2011-07-03 22:49:00 edit, speedy beat me to it. 4gb file size limit on fat32. gretag34 (16372)
1214465 2011-07-04 03:05:00 I need to share pen drives with Windows machines so I don't use a Linux format - either FAT32 or NTFS (much more reliable than FAT32).

Has anybody tried the relatively new extFAT (FAT64) for their pen drives?
johnd (85)
1214466 2011-07-04 03:26:00 Exfat by the looks of it, would remove the 4 GB file limit. However (like NTFS), some (or probably all) USB flash drives, wont boot if you format it in Exfat.

I'll try formatting this USB flash drive in Exfat, and see what happens
Speedy Gonzales (78)
1214467 2011-07-04 03:34:00 I have found that OSX Leopard can't write to ExFat. Not sure about Snow Leopard, I'm sure I read somewhere it was supposed to be able to.

I use NTFS for my drives, but am still using FAT32 for anything that needs to be used on Macs and PCs. ExFat would be better, but, at least on the one Leopard mac I've tried, it couldn't write.

Does anyone know for sure what OSX Leopard and later can and can't write to? It is a bit of a pain having a 1TB drive formatted in FAT32.
wratterus (105)
1214468 2011-07-04 03:38:00 According to this en.wikipedia.org

Mac OS X Snow Leopard (en.wikipedia.org) added exFAT support in version 10.6.5 on November 10, 2010.[11] (en.wikipedia.org) OS X 10.6.5 and later can read, write, and create exFAT partitions.

And An experimental, open source Linux kernel module that supports the reading of exFAT files is currently under development.[6] (en.wikipedia.org) A FUSE (en.wikipedia.org)-based full-featured implementation is currently in beta status.[7] (en.wikipedia.org) A proprietary, read/write solution, licensed and derived from the Microsoft exFAT implementation, is available for Android, Linux and other operating systems from Tuxera (en.wikipedia.org).
Speedy Gonzales (78)
1 2