Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 116678 2011-03-15 10:00:00 New Zealand Smoke free in 14 Years Bobh (5192) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1186420 2011-03-16 21:57:00 BS!!

The loss in Revenue to the government would be too great :( :(
Zippity (58)
1186421 2011-03-16 22:10:00 Woman at work is currently pregnant.

She hasn't stopped smoking yet and claims that she can't because of "blood pressure"

Disgusting.


Yet my Mum smoked when carrying me and my sister...she doesn't smoke, but I do!

I dont hold anything against her, certainly nothing wrong with me...I think too many people stick the nose into other peoples business!
SolMiester (139)
1186422 2011-03-16 22:12:00 About time. If things goes underground, fine by me. I'd rather a blackmarket in cigarettes than pot/P

And what would you know about it?
SolMiester (139)
1186423 2011-03-16 22:14:00 Only smokers I know that support National are Asian. The sort of person that smokes now days must be of low intelligence and normally has a low paid job.
Hardly a National voter

WOW, you truly are ignorant...I support National and wouldn't call an IT Consultancy a low paid job, but Im too modest to say Im highly intelligent!
SolMiester (139)
1186424 2011-03-16 22:16:00 I think I read that the GOVT makes $1.2B a year from the sales of smoking while smoking related health cost comes to $1.8B a year.

I found it...

Government collects over $1 billion million annually in tobacco tax and spends $56 million annually on tobacco control (persuading smokers to quit or smoke less, etc).

Thus by about January 19 of 2010 the smoker (at the rate of 35 cents tax per cigarette) has paid for the risk reduction and tobacco control services for the rest of the calendar year. However the disease and treatment costs, estimated at $1.8 billion for the year, are not fully recovered by the end of the year.
Tasha (16262)
1186425 2011-03-16 22:32:00 I think I read that the GOVT makes $1.2B a year from the sales of smoking while smoking related health cost comes to $1.8B a year.

I found it...

Source?

I've seen various estimates of these figures on both sides of the argument so "The Truth"(tm) is probably difficult to pinpoint.
The biggest problem is that the definition of "smoking related health cost" is an estimate, and can be manipulated to suit the argument, i.e if a patient smokes then any & all health problems can be lumped in the "smoking related" category
It is worth bearing in mind that this "contribution" is in ADDITION to the health component of taxes paid by everyone for their healthcare.


Thus by about January 19 of 2010 the smoker (at the rate of 35 cents tax per cigarette) has paid for the risk reduction and tobacco control services for the rest of the calendar year.Do away with the 'risk reduction and tobacco control services' and there is and extra 19 days of healthcare each :)
fred_fish (15241)
1186426 2011-03-16 22:35:00 I posted the source in the code. Tasha (16262)
1186427 2011-03-16 22:38:00 I posted the source in the code.

Cheers.
fred_fish (15241)
1186428 2011-03-16 22:43:00 I posted the source in the code.

Yep. From an organisation whos stated aim is to end smoking in NZ according to that site. :)
Snorkbox (15764)
1186429 2011-03-16 22:43:00 Note so sure about the voting, under the rabid anti smoking Klark and her communist regime they kept taxing the ciggies.
But because people are programmed at birth to vote labour they got in 3 times.
prefect (6291)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12