| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 117021 | 2011-03-30 06:01:00 | The moment now. | Cicero (40) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1190589 | 2011-03-30 08:08:00 | If you record a moment then it would be a copy of the moment but it would be only from one perspective unless you can recored the happenings of everything in the universe down to below sub atomic level at that precise moment | The Error Guy (14052) | ||
| 1190590 | 2011-03-30 08:12:00 | COP OUT Ancestry inevitability Inimitable Cloaked in web-like Secrecy The truth shall be lost For the greater -zygote Magic messages Sent along the genetical lines Coding backwaters Of mudslips Survival of the fittest Supposedly Chaotic beings - Ritualized into societies Feed on belief systems Of our impeccability and faultlessness This is full of fundamental flaws The floorboards are rotting Sacrificial sentimentality of bygone generations At least five generations back Will be affecting us now So where is free-will And choice? |
zqwerty (97) | ||
| 1190591 | 2011-03-30 08:54:00 | No. That is equivalent to saying that only one place exists. If you can only ever experience "here", then "there" is, by that logic, nonexistent. All places & times exist simultaneously, but your "moment" is entirely subjective and depends on the particular space-time co-ordinates occupied by the observer. :waughh: I think Dr Who already said that. Or was it Dr Spok? PJ:lol: |
Poppa John (284) | ||
| 1190592 | 2011-03-30 09:22:00 | Who decided it was possible to record a moment? I hypothesize that a moment can not be recorded. |
pine-o-cleen (2955) | ||
| 1190593 | 2011-03-30 09:23:00 | My cellphone has other ideas | ubergeek85 (131) | ||
| 1190594 | 2011-03-30 09:34:00 | You're not recording a moment. You're recording video. | pine-o-cleen (2955) | ||
| 1190595 | 2011-03-30 09:39:00 | I have nothing to say and I am saying it and that is poetry. -John Cage |
Agent_24 (57) | ||
| 1190596 | 2011-03-30 09:51:00 | Does a wise man like yourself really need an answer Cic? You may want to consider Renee Descartes - "I think therefore I am" ergo we only exist because you want us to. I'm flattered. :D Or the Copenhagen Interpretation much favoured by Einstein and Nils Bohr which supports your hypothesis. Sort of. For you, the subjective observer, this moment exists for you in local time. You cannot know what is happening elsewhere. Or...the Many Worlds interpretation which says that your "moment" exists across a multitude of universes and therefore cannot be alone. Hopefully Terry will come along and put us straight. |
Winston001 (3612) | ||
| 1190597 | 2011-03-30 19:04:00 | We try to answer this question from the outside, where the answer I think comes from the inside, from contemplating the idea. This woman gets a glimpse, for me, you have to leave out the noise at the end. goo.gl |
Cicero (40) | ||
| 1190598 | 2011-03-30 19:15:00 | You're not recording a moment. You're recording video. Well recording from a single perspective in reduced quality the reflected wavelengths of light from pure energy in the visible wavelength So its like taking a pixel and saying its an accurate interpretation of the entire screen |
The Error Guy (14052) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |||||