Forum Home
PC World Chat
 
Thread ID: 117487 2011-04-20 23:39:00 Seeking web developer for online shopping mall Kathryn (16347) PC World Chat
Post ID Timestamp Content User
1196015 2011-04-21 11:28:00 Hi
I'm looking for a web developer in the Auckland area to build an online shopping mall....

Good on you Kathryn. Tell me: why wouldn't I just go to a shopping mall? I can try clothes on and get the right size, see accurate colours, browse, discover stuff I didn't know about, bump into people I know, have a coffee in a warm environment, even watch sports on TV.

In fact, I may never leave. :devil
Winston001 (3612)
1196016 2011-04-21 12:01:00 Build something that does what Pricespy does but better in that it doesn't use 50,000 lines of Javascript for each button and I'll promise I'll use it for all my online computer shopping.

Yes there are those other sites but they do not seem to catalog as much stuff and stores as Pricespy does.
Agent_24 (57)
1196017 2011-04-21 12:22:00 I think you are all being too hard on Kathryn. We do not know nearly enough about the project to be making judgements on whether it has potential or not, nor is it what she asked for.

There may well be aspects of the project which we have not been told about which makes it more special than it sounds like.
george12 (7)
1196018 2011-04-21 12:35:00 I wasn't, I was being dead serious. Agent_24 (57)
1196019 2011-04-21 12:40:00 I wasn't, I was being dead serious.

Sorry Agent, was not directing that at you at all!
george12 (7)
1196020 2011-04-21 13:10:00 But then george12. By using the word ALL by definition it would include Agent_24 would it not?

I'm also in agreement somewhat with kahwawai chaser in so far as those questions should be answered.
Snorkbox (15764)
1196021 2011-04-21 14:54:00 I would agree with the pricespy comment, it has faar to much java to be useful. Very cluttered The Error Guy (14052)
1196022 2011-04-21 15:02:00 I do like the way you can sort stuff by brand, price, etc... but I wish they had used a more efficient way of doing it. Agent_24 (57)
1196023 2011-04-22 02:41:00 But then george12. By using the word ALL by definition it would include Agent_24 would it not?

You have got me there. Appalling misuse of the word 'all'. Apologies to all that have been misincluded (new word?).

What I meant was most of you :p.
george12 (7)
1196024 2011-04-22 02:46:00 You have got me there. Appalling misuse of the word 'all'. Apologies to all that have been misincluded (new word?).

What I meant was most of you :p.

Sounds more fair! But being the pedantic sod that I admit to being I try to say what I mean and mean what I say. :devil
Snorkbox (15764)
1 2 3