| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 117952 | 2011-05-12 00:38:00 | Are we supposed to feel sorry for him? | Zippity (58) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1201654 | 2011-05-16 23:42:00 | Yes apparently Investigate said Aliens did it, and Investigate still had a stronger case than the Police now have since the body was found somewhere it couldn't have been according to their version of events in Court. Grow up.:groan: |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1201655 | 2011-05-16 23:43:00 | I asked for "substantive" proof - not fairy tales and goblins :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: I knew you wouldn't read it but just make pathetic comments. You really are showing your true colours. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1201656 | 2011-05-16 23:46:00 | Casting pearls there, I think old boy. So true. So true young fella. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1201657 | 2011-05-17 01:16:00 | I knew you wouldn't read it but just make pathetic comments. You really are showing your true colours. Instead of making such childish comments, how about having the guts to answer the question I asked of you. You are coming across as a complete loser. |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1201658 | 2011-05-17 01:27:00 | Instead of making such childish comments, how about having the guts to answer the question I asked of you. You are coming across as a complete loser. So what information were you privy to and how did you obtain the said information you referred to earlier then? Name calling does not help people to arrive at a valid conclusion. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1201659 | 2011-05-17 02:09:00 | Instead of making such childish comments, how about having the guts to answer the question I asked of you. You are coming across as a complete loser. Have you read the article. I think not so it is the pot calling the kettle black. Once again you are showing your true colours and be careful because you are showing narcissistic tendencies. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1201660 | 2011-05-17 02:16:00 | Name calling does not help people to arrive at a valid conclusion. It has bought me to a very valid conclusion which I won't mention.;) |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1201661 | 2011-05-17 02:25:00 | It has bought me to a very valid conclusion which I won't mention.;) To make things clear I was referring to the possible guilt or innocence based on the actual admissable evidence adduced at trial rather than information that another party was privy to which, of course can't be considered by a Jury under our current Justice system. |
Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1201662 | 2011-05-17 04:24:00 | he's not a good man...no sympathy on him :( | rs1000 (16344) | ||
| 1201663 | 2011-05-17 04:54:00 | Sometimes the evidence is so damming that even an idiot will understand and accept it for what it is. Unfortunately if that same evidence is gained outside the ambit of the legal search warrant, it cannot be used in court as was the case with Tamihere :( :( |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |||||