| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 117952 | 2011-05-12 00:38:00 | Are we supposed to feel sorry for him? | Zippity (58) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1201624 | 2011-05-14 21:31:00 | They're here exclusively for personal gain, and heaps of it. :devil Thats right Theyre not doing this for money.......theyre doing this for a **** load of money:banana EDIT: Credits to spaceballs for that awesome line |
Gobe1 (6290) | ||
| 1201625 | 2011-05-15 10:25:00 | And what was that? Please substantiate your claim. In addition to the "evidence" about the watch that mzee mentioned, the police also "found" Tamihere's sleeping bag behind a couch in a hut - on their THIRD search ! Let's be generous and say it was outright incompetence. |
decibel (11645) | ||
| 1201626 | 2011-05-15 10:56:00 | For God's sake. Do your homework on the inadmissible evidence and the botched up search warrant and then report back your findings. |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1201627 | 2011-05-15 12:46:00 | For God's sake. Do your homework on the inadmissible evidence and the botched up search warrant and then report back your findings. The inadmissible evidence is irrelevant. The verdict was based on the admissible evidence as given to the jury. Tamahere may be guilty, only he knows that, but it was not proven in court so a guilty verdict should not have been given. |
mzee (3324) | ||
| 1201628 | 2011-05-15 13:33:00 | Perhaps Zippity knows that Tamihere did it as he was there at the time therefore Zippity has no doubt. | Snorkbox (15764) | ||
| 1201629 | 2011-05-15 20:28:00 | The guy was a crook before this, in the remote chance he didnt do it I dont care. His previous criminal activity was so bad he should have stayed in jail anyway. |
prefect (6291) | ||
| 1201630 | 2011-05-15 22:47:00 | Perhaps Zippity knows that Tamihere did it as he was there at the time therefore Zippity has no doubt. Ha ha - you are so wrong. But yes, I was/am privvy to other information. |
Zippity (58) | ||
| 1201631 | 2011-05-15 23:20:00 | Ha ha - you are so wrong. But yes, I was/am privvy to other information. Well unless you can enlighten us on what you were privy to it doesn't mean anything as it means we just have to take your word for it which I am not inclined to do from past experiences. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1201632 | 2011-05-15 23:25:00 | The guy was a crook before this, in the remote chance he didnt do it I dont care. His previous criminal activity was so bad he should have stayed in jail anyway. While I can sympathise with your sentiments there the trouble is other people have had there whole lives ruined because of remote chances. |
mikebartnz (21) | ||
| 1201633 | 2011-05-15 23:26:00 | deleted | Zippity (58) | ||
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | |||||