| Forum Home | ||||
| PC World Chat | ||||
| Thread ID: 118599 | 2011-06-13 03:22:00 | Comparing WindowsImageBackup with Acronis True Image Home 2011 | BBCmicro (15761) | PC World Chat |
| Post ID | Timestamp | Content | User | ||
| 1208855 | 2011-06-14 00:36:00 | I've been using Acronis True Image for several years and have found it excellent. If you have a Windows computer and you don't use imaging software you're a mug. For those who are too miserly to shell out for Acronis True Image, there are alternatives. Paragon have released a free-for-home-use version which is quite good although not as intuitive as Acronis. I've elaborated on the best free and paid alternatives here (www.mistywindow.com). :) |
Vallis (8886) | ||
| 1208856 | 2011-06-29 05:40:00 | Is that Active Backup Expert from Orion Software Labs? | Zippy (15131) | ||
| 1208857 | 2011-06-29 05:51:00 | I use W7 because it's free :D :thumbs: Really, I just need one image from date of system build and then one other as time goes on ..... I don't load images that often :p I prefer to use my computer as a tool. Well ... compared to the older days, Norton Ghost really did offer a lot of compression like it takes half the space. Windows I think only takes off 20%. With W7 you need to rename the folder before you make another image or else it would overwrite it. |
Nomad (952) | ||
| 1208858 | 2011-06-29 05:53:00 | For those who are too miserly to shell out for Acronis True Image, there are alternatives. Paragon have released a free-for-home-use version which is quite good although not as intuitive as Acronis. [/URL]. :) Just don't use it often enough. Once every few yrs maybe :D But Paragon is only free to 32bit I think. The 64bit might of been free for a while, but that was only temporarily via a download. |
Nomad (952) | ||
| 1 2 | |||||